Figure 12.

Comparison of gating in 2 mM Ca2+o vs. Ba2+o. Values are from all control recordings (n = 52 in Ca2+o, n = 47 in Ba2+o). (A) Effects of Ca2+ (▪) and Ba2+ (○) on inactivation of inward currents. Time constants were averaged over a 20–30-mV range, centered ∼30 mV negative to the reversal potential (A). (B) I-V relations in 2 mM Ca2+o vs. 2 mM Ba2+o. The same symbols were used in B and D–F (defined in B). Outward currents for the most positive voltage steps (up to +100 mV) are offscale. (C) Voltage shifts, 2 mM Ba2+ minus 2 mM Ca2+. Experimental values (“Data”) and theoretical values (“Model”) are from the analysis shown in D–F. Voltage shifts were measured as in Fig. 5, for both experimental data and model output. (D) PO,r in 2 mM Ca2+o or Ba2+o (from Fig. 2, C and D). (E) τIIV (from Fig. 3, A and B). (F) TPeak (from Fig. 3, E and F). Smooth curves in D–F are calculated from a fit to the Serrano et al. (1999) model (see text). Parameter values for Ca2+ (named as in Serrano et al., 1999) were kV = 2521.1 s−1, k-V = 7.7 s−1, kO = 3601.1 s−1, k-O = 23.1 s−1, kI = 70.1 s−1, k-I = 1.4 s−1, f = 0.7555, h = 0.0999. kV, k-V, and k-O changed with depolarization e-fold for 24.8062, −17.0591, and −34.114 mV (respectively). Parameters were identical in Ba2+, except kI = 122.5 s−1, thus kI,Ca/ kI,Ba = 0.57.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal