Figure 1.

iT reg cells are generated in 1B3.RAG−/− mouse in the periphery. (a) Flow cytometric staining for Foxp3 expression in CD4+CD8 T cells in the thymus and spleen of 5-wk-old 1B3.RAG−/− (top) or 1B3.RAG+/− littermates (bottom). Numbers indicate mean ± SD of Foxp3+ cells from four individual mice. (b) Foxp3 expression in the CD4+CD8 T cells from thymus or pooled spleen+LN of 1B3.RAG−/− or 1B3.RAG+/− littermate mice aged 1–3 or 4–6 wk. Each dot represents percentage of Foxp3+ cells from an individual mouse and bars represent means. (c) Foxp3 staining in pooled spleen and LN cells from 3.5–4-wk-old mice thymectomized neonatally. Littermates 1B3.RAG+/− or sham-operated 1B3.RAG−/− mice were used as controls. A single representative mouse out of five thymectomized mice is shown. (d) Foxp3 staining in Thy1.2+ cells in the CD4+CD8 subset after intrathymic injection of 107 thymocytes from 1-wk-old 1B3, 1B3.RAG−/−, WT, or POT (P0-specific TCR-Tg) mice into congenic Thy1.1 host, followed by flow cytometry on day 4. A representative plot is shown on the left. On the right are graphs showing the percentage of Foxp3+ cells among CD4+CD8 cells (top) and percentage of Thy1.2+ cells among total thymocytes (bottom) with bars representing means. Data are representative of two independent experiments. (e) Mixed bone marrow chimeras were generated by mixing (1:1) congenically marked WT and 1B3.RAG−/− bone marrow. 6 wk after reconstitution, spleen and LN cells were isolated and CD4+ cells were stained intracellularly for Foxp3 in respective compartments. Representative plot showing Foxp3 staining in CD4+ T cells 1B3.RAG or WT compartments (left) and graph showing pooled data (right) are shown with bar representing mean. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal