Figure S3.

Synaptic marker immunoreactivity at Dscam2 mutant NMJs and results from the Dscam2 interactor candidate screen. (A–D) Representative images of dlg immunoreactivity in control (A), Dscam2null (B), Dscam2A (C), and Dscam2B (D) in MN6/7-Ib (Ib) and MNSNb/d-Is (Is). Scale bar, 10 µm. (E and E’) Quantification of diameter of anti-dlg immunoreactivity surrounding boutons. Data shown as mean ± SEM, n indicated in graph; one-way ANOVA; groups compared with Tukey's post-test. ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. (F–I) Representative images of anti-Syt1 immunoreactivity in control (F), Dscam2null (G), Dscam2A (H), and Dscam2B (I) in Ib and Is. Scale bar, 10 µm. (J and J’) Quantification of anti-Syt1 immunofluorescence (IF) intensity relative to control. Data shown as mean ± SEM; n indicated in graph; one-way ANOVA; groups compared with Tukey’s post-test. (K) Quantification of EJP amplitude in different combinations of genotypes. Stock numbers listed in Materials and methods. Data shown as mean ± SEM; n indicated in graph. Kruskal-Wallis test; groups compared with Dunn’s post-test. **, P < 0.01. IF, immunofluorescence.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal