Figure 10.

Protection from GvHD is encoded in NFATc1/ΔS+ T conv as well as in NFATc1/ΔS+ T regs. (A) Detection of CD25+ Foxp3+ cells as percentage of CD4+CD90.1+ in spleen and mesenteric LNs of aGvHD-induced mice on day 6. Transplanted allogenic luc+ T cells were derived from WT versus Nfatc1deltaSUMO mice. Statistical significance was calculated using Student’s t test; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. (B) Evaluation of surface expression of TIGIT on CD4+CD90.1+ T conv (no TIGIT detectable) and CD4+CD90.1+ Foxp3+ T regs regained from spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes of aGvHD-induced mice on day 6 by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was calculated with Student’s t test; **, P < 0.01. (C–F) Allogenic pure CD90.1+ luc+ WT versus NFATc1/ΔS+ T conv from pretreated DEREG+ mice were transferred together with BM CD90.2+ luc and CD90.1+ luc WT versus NFATc1/ΔS+ T regs in all possible combinations. (C and D) Representative in vivo BLI (C) and ex vivo BLI data from internal organs (D). In vivo data were quantified on days 3 and 5 after aGvHD induction, ex vivo on day 6. Two-way ANOVA; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005; ***, P < 0.001. (E) Estimation of CD25+ Foxp3+ (CD4 gate) T reg frequencies in the presence of WT versus NFATc1/ΔS+ T conv by flow cytometry 6 d after T conv transfer. (F) IL-2 expression per CD4+ T cell (mean fluorescent intensity [MFI]) 6 d after T conv transfer. (G) Frequencies of splenic IL-2+ CD4+ T cells 6 d after T conv transfer, analyzed by flow cytometry and quantified from n = 4; two-way ANOVA; *, P < 0.05.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal