Figure 3.

CAR is enriched at sites of microvilli close contacts in synapses with cognate antigen, but not following engagement of endogenous TCR. (A–C) Three examples of anti-HER2 CAR T cells interacting with HER2+ SKBR3 are shown from an oblique view of the synapse interface (A, Imaris normal shading mode, scale bar = 2 μm), en face synapse view (B, Imaris normal shading mode, scale bar = 2 μm), and a single z-slice (C, scale bar = 1 μm). The SKBR3 target cell location is marked by dashed magenta lines (A and C). Human CD8+ T cell expressing anti-HER2 CAR (4D5) was labeled with antibodies to MYC (CAR)-Alexa488 and CD45-Alexa647. (D) Schematic of synaptic contact mapping method. Lipid bilayer on glass support is loaded with Qdot 605, which is a red-fluorescent probe that occupies ∼16 nm in height. Areas where the cell makes a close contact (<16 nm distance) appear as holes in the QD605 signal. (E) CAR T cell synapse imaged by TIRF showing CAR-mEmerald, MV projections (as seen by holes in QD605 signal), and overlay. Human CD8+ T cell expressing anti-HER2 CAR (mut4D5) interacting with lipid bilayer loaded with 625 ng HER2 + ICAM + QD605. Scale bar = 2 μm. (F) Line scans from E show anti-correlation of CAR-mEmerald and QD605, indicating enrichment of CARs within MV contacts. (G) OT-I mouse T cells were retrovirally transduced with anti-HER2 CAR (mutCD45). Synapse shown was formed on lipid bilayer loaded with pMHC:SL8 + ICAM + QD605. TIRF imaging of CAR-mEmerald, QD605, and overlay are shown. Scale bar = 2 μm. (H) Line scans from G showing the lack of enrichment in CAR signal within QD605 holes, indicating that CAR microclusters do not accumulate in MV close contacts in absence of the CAR’s cognate antigen.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal