| MT association | Plus end–directed motility | Plus end tracking | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOD324 | − | − | − |
| NOD324CC | ++ | − | − |
| NOD485 | + | − | − |
| NOD485CC | ++ | + | + |
| NOD325-485 | − | − | − |
| NOD325-485-CC | ± | − | − |
| Kinesin-1 CC | ± | − | − |
| MT association | Plus end–directed motility | Plus end tracking | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOD324 | − | − | − |
| NOD324CC | ++ | − | − |
| NOD485 | + | − | − |
| NOD485CC | ++ | + | + |
| NOD325-485 | − | − | − |
| NOD325-485-CC | ± | − | − |
| Kinesin-1 CC | ± | − | − |
CC, Kinesin-1 CC domain; −, not observed; ±, weak and variable localization to a subset of MTs; +, weak association; ++, strong association. Classifications were determined by live cell imaging. The ± constructs were designated as variable because they weakly localized to a subset of apparently bundled MTs in some interphase cells. MT association of NOD485 was designated as weak (+) because it was not retained after fixation with paraformaldehyde and permeabilization with detergent during preparations for immunofluorescence.
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.