Table 4.
Model statistics from fitting simulated data in Fig. 4
ModelnLinkedqSSRχυ2BICΔBIC
r0 and σr 11 0.13044 1.7759 -6776.0 422.3 
Nothing 15 0.08557 1.1268 -7106.9 91.4 
r0 and σr 16 0.07588 0.9945 -7198.3 0.0 
Nothing 24 0.07503 0.9945 -7153.3 45.1 
r0 and σr 21 0.07532 0.9944 -7170.2 28.1 
Nothing 33 0.07377 0.9878 -7108.0 90.3 
ModelnLinkedqSSRχυ2BICΔBIC
r0 and σr 11 0.13044 1.7759 -6776.0 422.3 
Nothing 15 0.08557 1.1268 -7106.9 91.4 
r0 and σr 16 0.07588 0.9945 -7198.3 0.0 
Nothing 24 0.07503 0.9945 -7153.3 45.1 
r0 and σr 21 0.07532 0.9944 -7170.2 28.1 
Nothing 33 0.07377 0.9878 -7108.0 90.3 

The models differ in the number of Gaussian components, n, used to define the distance distributions and in how their parameters are linked for the different datasets. In all models, the modulation depths, Δ, and the background parameters, η, for the different datasets are not linked. A video (Video 3) demonstrating the use of GLADDvu to perform the fits of these simulated data is available.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal