Table 3.

Clinical performance of approved TCEs

TCETargetIndicationEfficacySafetyRef
ResponsesmDORmPFSmOSCRS or ICANSTRSAESpecific AE
All grades≥ grade 3
Blinatumomab CD19 r/r B-ALL, phase 3 CR 34% vs. 16% SOC ​ 7.3 vs. 4.6 m SOC 7.7 vs. 4 m SOC 14.2% CRS 4.9% CRS, 9.4% neurologic events 3% fatal, 4% CRS CRS, neurologic events, infusion reactions, sepsis, infections, cytopenias Kantarjian et al. (2017), Pulte et al. (2018)  
r/r B-ALL, real-world data Ph, 46% CR, Ph+, 41% CR ​ Ph, 11 m, Ph+, 6.7 m Ph, 12.2 m, Ph+, 16.3 m ​ ​ ​ ​ Boissel et al. (2023)  
Mosunetuzumab CD20 r/r FL 80% ORR, 60% CR 22.8 m 17.9 m 89.6% (18 m) 43% CRS,
5% mild ICANS 
2% CRS 47% CRS, neurologic events, infections, cytopenias Budde et al. (2022b)  
Epcoritamab CD20 r/r LBCL, 2-year follow-up 63.1% ORR, 40.1% CR 17.3 m 4.4 m 18.5 m 51% CRS, 6.4% ICANS 3.2% CRS, 0.6% ICANS 11.5%. 0.6% fatal ICANS, 0.6% COVID-19 pneumonia, 0.6% bacterial pneumonia CRS, neurologic events, neutropenia, infections Thieblemont et al. (2023, 2024)  
r/r FL r/r FL, optimization cohort: 91% ORR, 68% CR ​ ​ ​ r/r FL, optimization cohort: 49% CRS, 0% ICANS r/r FL, optimization cohort: 0% CRS, 0% ICANS ​ ​ Linton et al. (2024), Vose et al. (2024)  
Glofitamab CD20 r/r B-NHL 53.8% ORR, 36.8% CR (at RP2D: 65.7 and 57.1%) 5.5 m 2.9 m ​ 50.3% CRS, 5.2% ICANS, 43.3% neurologic AE 3.5% CRS, 1.2% ICANS 45%, none fatal CRS, neurologic, infections, neutropenia (Hutchings et al., 2021) 
r/r MCL 85% ORR, 78.3% CR 16.2 m 16.8 m 29.9 m 70% CRS, 11.7% neurologic AE 11.6% CRS, no neurologic AE 60%, none grade 5 (fatal) ​ (Phillips et al., 2025) 
Odronextamab CD20 r/r FL 80% ORR, 73% CR 22.6 m 20.7 m NR 56% CRS, 0.8% ICANS 0.8% CRS, no ICANS 44.5%, 3% fatal CRS, cytopenias, infections, pyrexia Blair (2024), Kim et al. (2024)  
r/r DLBCL 52% ORR, 31% CR 10.2 m ​ ​ 55% CRS, no ICANS 1% CRS, no ICANS 4% fatal COVID-19 infections CRS, cytopenias, infections, pyrexia Ayyappan et al. (2023), Blair (2024)  
Teclistamab BCMA r/r MM, 2-year follow-up Original ORR 63%, 58.8% VGPR or better;
2-year follow-up: 43% CR 
24 m 12.5 m 21.9 m 72% CRS, 14.5% neurologic events, 3% ICANS 0.6% CRS, 0.6% neurologic events, 0% ICANS 3.6% deaths CRS, neurologic events, infections, cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinemia Donk et al. (2023), Moreau et al. (2022)  
Elranatamab BCMA r/r MM Original, 56% VGPR or better, 35% CR;
Prolonged follow-up: 61% ORR, 37.4% CR 
NR 17.2 m 24.6 m 57.7% CRS, 4.9% ICANS 0% CRS, 0% ICANS 3.25% deaths (2.4% lethal infections) CRS, cytopenias, neutropenia, infections Lesokhin et al. (2023), Tomasson et al. (2024)  
Linvoseltamab-gcpt BCMA r/r MM 70% ORR, 45% CR or better, 19% VGPR NR. Bumma: 29.4 m Bumma: NR Bumma: 31.4 m 46% CRS, 8% ICANS 0.9% CRS, 2.6% ICANS 74% SAE,
7% fatal: 3.4% sepsis, 0.9% chronic kidney disease, 0.9% pneumonia, 0.9% TLS, 0.9% encephalopathy 
CRS, neurologic events, infusion reactions, infections, cytopenias Bumma et al. (2024), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (2025a)  
Talquetamab GPRC5D r/r MM 73–74% ORR, 57–59% VGPR or better;
Phase 1: 64–70% ORR, 52–57% VGPR or better, 23% CR 
​ 7.5–11.9 m ​ 75–79% CRS, 11% ICANS Phase 1: 0–3% CRS No deaths CRS, neurologic, infections, skin-related, nail-related, dysgeusia, cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinemia Chari et al. (2022), Schinke et al. (2023)  
Tebentafusp gp100/HLA-A*02:01 Uveal melanoma, phase 3, 3-year follow-up ORR 11% vs. 5% IC; CR <1% vs. 0% 11.1 vs. 9.7 m 3.4 vs. 2.9 m 21.6 vs. 16.9 m 89% CRS 1% CRS ​ CRS, skin events Hassel et al. (2023), Nathan et al. (2021)  
Tarlatamab DLL3 Pretreated ES-SCLC 10 mg: 40% ORR, 1% CR. 100 mg: 32% ORR, 8% CR ​ 10 mg: 4.9 m. 100 mg: 3.9 m 10 mg: 14.3 m. 100 mg: NE 10 mg: 51% CRS, 8% ICANS. 100 mg: 61% CRS, 28% ICANS 10 mg: 1% CRS, 0% ICANS. 100 mg: 6% CRS, 5% ICANS 10 mg: 1% fatal respiratory failure CRS, neurologic events, cytopenias Ahn et al. (2023), Herrera et al. (2024)  
Catumaxomab EpCAM Malignant ascites in adults with EpCAM+ carcinomas ​ ​ mPuFS, OC: 48 vs. 11 d (control)*.
mPuFS, non-OC: 30 vs. 14 d (control)* 
72 vs. 71 d (control)* 23% CRS 11/41 CRS episodes 15%. Integrated analysis of 11 studies: SIRS, hepatic failure CRS, SIRS, abdominal pain, cytopenias, elevated liver enzymes, infections EMA (2025), Syed (2025)  
TCETargetIndicationEfficacySafetyRef
ResponsesmDORmPFSmOSCRS or ICANSTRSAESpecific AE
All grades≥ grade 3
Blinatumomab CD19 r/r B-ALL, phase 3 CR 34% vs. 16% SOC ​ 7.3 vs. 4.6 m SOC 7.7 vs. 4 m SOC 14.2% CRS 4.9% CRS, 9.4% neurologic events 3% fatal, 4% CRS CRS, neurologic events, infusion reactions, sepsis, infections, cytopenias Kantarjian et al. (2017), Pulte et al. (2018)  
r/r B-ALL, real-world data Ph, 46% CR, Ph+, 41% CR ​ Ph, 11 m, Ph+, 6.7 m Ph, 12.2 m, Ph+, 16.3 m ​ ​ ​ ​ Boissel et al. (2023)  
Mosunetuzumab CD20 r/r FL 80% ORR, 60% CR 22.8 m 17.9 m 89.6% (18 m) 43% CRS,
5% mild ICANS 
2% CRS 47% CRS, neurologic events, infections, cytopenias Budde et al. (2022b)  
Epcoritamab CD20 r/r LBCL, 2-year follow-up 63.1% ORR, 40.1% CR 17.3 m 4.4 m 18.5 m 51% CRS, 6.4% ICANS 3.2% CRS, 0.6% ICANS 11.5%. 0.6% fatal ICANS, 0.6% COVID-19 pneumonia, 0.6% bacterial pneumonia CRS, neurologic events, neutropenia, infections Thieblemont et al. (2023, 2024)  
r/r FL r/r FL, optimization cohort: 91% ORR, 68% CR ​ ​ ​ r/r FL, optimization cohort: 49% CRS, 0% ICANS r/r FL, optimization cohort: 0% CRS, 0% ICANS ​ ​ Linton et al. (2024), Vose et al. (2024)  
Glofitamab CD20 r/r B-NHL 53.8% ORR, 36.8% CR (at RP2D: 65.7 and 57.1%) 5.5 m 2.9 m ​ 50.3% CRS, 5.2% ICANS, 43.3% neurologic AE 3.5% CRS, 1.2% ICANS 45%, none fatal CRS, neurologic, infections, neutropenia (Hutchings et al., 2021) 
r/r MCL 85% ORR, 78.3% CR 16.2 m 16.8 m 29.9 m 70% CRS, 11.7% neurologic AE 11.6% CRS, no neurologic AE 60%, none grade 5 (fatal) ​ (Phillips et al., 2025) 
Odronextamab CD20 r/r FL 80% ORR, 73% CR 22.6 m 20.7 m NR 56% CRS, 0.8% ICANS 0.8% CRS, no ICANS 44.5%, 3% fatal CRS, cytopenias, infections, pyrexia Blair (2024), Kim et al. (2024)  
r/r DLBCL 52% ORR, 31% CR 10.2 m ​ ​ 55% CRS, no ICANS 1% CRS, no ICANS 4% fatal COVID-19 infections CRS, cytopenias, infections, pyrexia Ayyappan et al. (2023), Blair (2024)  
Teclistamab BCMA r/r MM, 2-year follow-up Original ORR 63%, 58.8% VGPR or better;
2-year follow-up: 43% CR 
24 m 12.5 m 21.9 m 72% CRS, 14.5% neurologic events, 3% ICANS 0.6% CRS, 0.6% neurologic events, 0% ICANS 3.6% deaths CRS, neurologic events, infections, cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinemia Donk et al. (2023), Moreau et al. (2022)  
Elranatamab BCMA r/r MM Original, 56% VGPR or better, 35% CR;
Prolonged follow-up: 61% ORR, 37.4% CR 
NR 17.2 m 24.6 m 57.7% CRS, 4.9% ICANS 0% CRS, 0% ICANS 3.25% deaths (2.4% lethal infections) CRS, cytopenias, neutropenia, infections Lesokhin et al. (2023), Tomasson et al. (2024)  
Linvoseltamab-gcpt BCMA r/r MM 70% ORR, 45% CR or better, 19% VGPR NR. Bumma: 29.4 m Bumma: NR Bumma: 31.4 m 46% CRS, 8% ICANS 0.9% CRS, 2.6% ICANS 74% SAE,
7% fatal: 3.4% sepsis, 0.9% chronic kidney disease, 0.9% pneumonia, 0.9% TLS, 0.9% encephalopathy 
CRS, neurologic events, infusion reactions, infections, cytopenias Bumma et al. (2024), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (2025a)  
Talquetamab GPRC5D r/r MM 73–74% ORR, 57–59% VGPR or better;
Phase 1: 64–70% ORR, 52–57% VGPR or better, 23% CR 
​ 7.5–11.9 m ​ 75–79% CRS, 11% ICANS Phase 1: 0–3% CRS No deaths CRS, neurologic, infections, skin-related, nail-related, dysgeusia, cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinemia Chari et al. (2022), Schinke et al. (2023)  
Tebentafusp gp100/HLA-A*02:01 Uveal melanoma, phase 3, 3-year follow-up ORR 11% vs. 5% IC; CR <1% vs. 0% 11.1 vs. 9.7 m 3.4 vs. 2.9 m 21.6 vs. 16.9 m 89% CRS 1% CRS ​ CRS, skin events Hassel et al. (2023), Nathan et al. (2021)  
Tarlatamab DLL3 Pretreated ES-SCLC 10 mg: 40% ORR, 1% CR. 100 mg: 32% ORR, 8% CR ​ 10 mg: 4.9 m. 100 mg: 3.9 m 10 mg: 14.3 m. 100 mg: NE 10 mg: 51% CRS, 8% ICANS. 100 mg: 61% CRS, 28% ICANS 10 mg: 1% CRS, 0% ICANS. 100 mg: 6% CRS, 5% ICANS 10 mg: 1% fatal respiratory failure CRS, neurologic events, cytopenias Ahn et al. (2023), Herrera et al. (2024)  
Catumaxomab EpCAM Malignant ascites in adults with EpCAM+ carcinomas ​ ​ mPuFS, OC: 48 vs. 11 d (control)*.
mPuFS, non-OC: 30 vs. 14 d (control)* 
72 vs. 71 d (control)* 23% CRS 11/41 CRS episodes 15%. Integrated analysis of 11 studies: SIRS, hepatic failure CRS, SIRS, abdominal pain, cytopenias, elevated liver enzymes, infections EMA (2025), Syed (2025)  

Data are from published pivotal trials, including recent updates and select real-world data. Additional discussions are in references Falchi et al. (2023), Herrera et al. (2024), and Strohl (2024). Specific AE are AE considered specific for the respective TCE. * indicates that the trial compared catumaxomab + paracentesis treatment with paracentesis-only controls. However, the control group included crossover patients and thus may overestimate efficacy in that group. AE, adverse effects; BCMA, B cell maturation antigen, also known as tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 17 (TNFRSF17); d, day(s); gp100, glycoprotein 100, also known as premelanosome protein (PMEL); GPRC5D, G protein–coupled receptor family C group 5 member D; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; IC, investigator’s choice therapy; m, months; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; mDOR, median duration of response; mPuFS, median puncture-free survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; NE, not evaluated; NR, not reached; OC, ovarian cancer; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival (duration in parentheses); Ph, Philadelphia chromosome; r/r, relapsed or refractory; RP2D, recommended phase 2 dose; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome; SOC, standard of care; TLS, tumor lysis syndrome; VGPR, very good partial response.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal