Table 2.

Transition rate constants for IKs models


Model
α(0)
(ms−1)
β(0)
(ms)
δ(0)
(ms−1)
γ(0)
(ms−1)
κ(0)
(ms−1)
λ(0)
(ms−1)
Zα (e0)Zβ (e0)Zδ (e0)Zγ (e0)Zκ (e0)Zλ (e0)
(1) EQ*QQ*Q* + E1
Whole-cell patch clamp 
2.38e-5 1.48e-4     7.45e-1 −9.0e-1     
(2) EQ*QQ*Q* + E1
Optimized for Scheme 1 C model 
2.678e-5 9.704e-5     8.68e-1 −8.56e-1     
(3) Scheme 1 B, EQ*Q+E1 model, optimized 1.201e-4 9.527e-5     4.860e-1 9.195e-1     
(4) Scheme 1 A, wt EQ model, optimized 2.567e-4 8.227e-5     4.636e-1 9.161e-1     
(5) G219C psQ+E1Voltage clamp fluorimetry 4.817e-3 1.596e-4 3.354e-4 3.895e-4   4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1   
(6) G219C psQQ*+E1
Voltage clamp fluorimetry 
4.255e-3 1.6e-4 1.363e-4 3.895e-4   4.863e-1 −4.50e-1 6.99e-1 −5.38e-1   
(7) Scheme 2 A, psQ+E1, optimized 9.63e-4 3.19e-5 1.34e-4 1.56e-4   4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1   
(8) Scheme 2 B, psQQ*+E1, optimized 8.51e-4 3.19e-5 5.45e-5 1.558e-4   4.863e-1 −4.50e-1 6.99e-1 −5.38e-1   
(9) Scheme 4 allosteric models, optimized, D = 1.357 8.71e-4 2.43e-5 2.88e-5 6.92e-5   4.75e-1 −4.34e-1 6.52e-1 −5.07e-1   
Mean rates, n = 5 ± SEM 9.23e-4 ± 4.92e-5 2.60e-5 ± 1.32e-6 4.42e-5 ± 1.03e-5 1.54e-4 ± 5.73e-5   4.87e-1 ± 0.009 −4.64e-1 ± 0.007 6.89e-1 ± 0.011 −5.62e-1 ± 0.042   
(10) Scheme 5 allosteric models, optimized 9.64e-4 3.19e-5 1.042e-4 1.298e-4 6.053e-5 7.79e-5 4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1 
Mean rates, n = 4 ± SEM 9.55e-4 ± 1.84e-5 3.29e-5 ± 3.90e-7 1.152e-4 ± 1.27e-5 1.214e-4 ± 9.486e-6 7.455e-5 ± 5.41e-6 5.844e-5 ± 8.84e-6 4.76e-1 ± 0.011 −4.61e-1 ± 0.004 5.96e-1 ± 0.024 −6.15e-1 ± 0.038 6.03e-1 ± 0.030 −5.67e-1 ± 0.013 
(11) Scheme 5 B, τact and Δt optimized 2.89e-3 9.57e-5 5.21e-5 6.49e-5 1.82e-4 2.34e-4 4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1 3.23e-1 −5.38e-1 
(12) Scheme 5 C, τact and Δt optimized 3.85e-3 1.28e-4 3.473e-5 4.33e-5 3.03e-4 3.89e-4 4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1 4.30e-1 −5.38e-1 

Model
α(0)
(ms−1)
β(0)
(ms)
δ(0)
(ms−1)
γ(0)
(ms−1)
κ(0)
(ms−1)
λ(0)
(ms−1)
Zα (e0)Zβ (e0)Zδ (e0)Zγ (e0)Zκ (e0)Zλ (e0)
(1) EQ*QQ*Q* + E1
Whole-cell patch clamp 
2.38e-5 1.48e-4     7.45e-1 −9.0e-1     
(2) EQ*QQ*Q* + E1
Optimized for Scheme 1 C model 
2.678e-5 9.704e-5     8.68e-1 −8.56e-1     
(3) Scheme 1 B, EQ*Q+E1 model, optimized 1.201e-4 9.527e-5     4.860e-1 9.195e-1     
(4) Scheme 1 A, wt EQ model, optimized 2.567e-4 8.227e-5     4.636e-1 9.161e-1     
(5) G219C psQ+E1Voltage clamp fluorimetry 4.817e-3 1.596e-4 3.354e-4 3.895e-4   4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1   
(6) G219C psQQ*+E1
Voltage clamp fluorimetry 
4.255e-3 1.6e-4 1.363e-4 3.895e-4   4.863e-1 −4.50e-1 6.99e-1 −5.38e-1   
(7) Scheme 2 A, psQ+E1, optimized 9.63e-4 3.19e-5 1.34e-4 1.56e-4   4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1   
(8) Scheme 2 B, psQQ*+E1, optimized 8.51e-4 3.19e-5 5.45e-5 1.558e-4   4.863e-1 −4.50e-1 6.99e-1 −5.38e-1   
(9) Scheme 4 allosteric models, optimized, D = 1.357 8.71e-4 2.43e-5 2.88e-5 6.92e-5   4.75e-1 −4.34e-1 6.52e-1 −5.07e-1   
Mean rates, n = 5 ± SEM 9.23e-4 ± 4.92e-5 2.60e-5 ± 1.32e-6 4.42e-5 ± 1.03e-5 1.54e-4 ± 5.73e-5   4.87e-1 ± 0.009 −4.64e-1 ± 0.007 6.89e-1 ± 0.011 −5.62e-1 ± 0.042   
(10) Scheme 5 allosteric models, optimized 9.64e-4 3.19e-5 1.042e-4 1.298e-4 6.053e-5 7.79e-5 4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1 
Mean rates, n = 4 ± SEM 9.55e-4 ± 1.84e-5 3.29e-5 ± 3.90e-7 1.152e-4 ± 1.27e-5 1.214e-4 ± 9.486e-6 7.455e-5 ± 5.41e-6 5.844e-5 ± 8.84e-6 4.76e-1 ± 0.011 −4.61e-1 ± 0.004 5.96e-1 ± 0.024 −6.15e-1 ± 0.038 6.03e-1 ± 0.030 −5.67e-1 ± 0.013 
(11) Scheme 5 B, τact and Δt optimized 2.89e-3 9.57e-5 5.21e-5 6.49e-5 1.82e-4 2.34e-4 4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1 3.23e-1 −5.38e-1 
(12) Scheme 5 C, τact and Δt optimized 3.85e-3 1.28e-4 3.473e-5 4.33e-5 3.03e-4 3.89e-4 4.50e-1 −4.50e-1 5.38e-1 −5.38e-1 4.30e-1 −5.38e-1 

Rate constants obtained directly from fits to experimental data and modified rate constants obtained after model optimization, as indicated. For Schemes 4 and 5 models, the single best optimization result as determined by “fval” (MATLAB), the minimum value of the objective function at the solution, is shown, as well as mean data from a number of optimization runs starting from different initial parameter values. The best solution was used to generate plots for Schemes 4 and 5 models. Optimizing transition kinetics used G-V, F-V, tact-V, Δt -V experimental data, and the F2/F1 ratio (see Materials and methods).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal