Table 1.

Average values for spontaneous CL in numerical models with different CRU distributions in basal state and in response to βAR stimulation (see respective plots in Fig. 9 A)

Cycle lengthSquare latticeSD = 0.25, µmSD = 0.5, µmSD = 0.75, µmUniformly random
Basal state, ms 461.3167 410.225 367.36 346.2667 318.1686 
βAR stimulation, ms 290.5686 282.0629 267.9727 262.6303 265.9219 
Change, ms 170.7481 128.1621 99.38727 83.63636 52.2467 
Change, % 37.01321 31.24191 27.05446 24.15374 16.42107 
Cycle lengthSquare latticeSD = 0.25, µmSD = 0.5, µmSD = 0.75, µmUniformly random
Basal state, ms 461.3167 410.225 367.36 346.2667 318.1686 
βAR stimulation, ms 290.5686 282.0629 267.9727 262.6303 265.9219 
Change, ms 170.7481 128.1621 99.38727 83.63636 52.2467 
Change, % 37.01321 31.24191 27.05446 24.15374 16.42107 

SD provides the deviating from the square lattice positions, following Gaussian distribution with SD. (1) CRUs placed exactly at the nodes of a square lattice of 1.44 µm size. (2) CRUs slightly deviating from the square lattice positions, following Gaussian distribution with SD = 0.25 µm. (3) CRUs moderately deviating from square lattice positions, following Gaussian distribution with SD = 0.5 µm. (4) CRUs strongly deviating from the square lattice positions, following Gaussian distribution with SD = 0.75 µm. (5) Uniformly random CRU positions excluding overlap. CL was measured for the time interval from 5 to 16.5 s (when simulations ended). All model simulations began with identical initial conditions and the initial 5 s period was omitted from the analysis to allow the system to reach a balance (see our original intervalograms in Fig. S3).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal