Table II. Whole cell PAGFP equilibration... | Rockefeller University Press

Table II.

Whole cell PAGFP equilibration parameters

Cell	t_1/2 equilibration	D_CC, Flux method	D_CC, 1-D rod model	D_OS, (axial)
	min	µm² s⁻¹	µm² s⁻¹	µm² s⁻¹
1	5	4.5	3.3	0.096
2	6.7	2.0	1.3	0.117
3	9.2	4.0	2.5	0.075
4	5.3	1.4	1.3	0.117
5	nd	nd	3.4	0.062
6	5	3.7	nd	0.074
7	11.5	1.0	1.4	0.033
8	9.9	nd	1.6	0.083
9	3.45	nd	2.0	0.050
mean ± SEM	7.0 ± 1.0	2.8 ± 0.5^a^b	2.1 ± 0.3^a^b	0.079 ± 0.009^b

Cell	t_1/2 equilibration	D_CC, Flux method	D_CC, 1-D rod model	D_OS, (axial)
	min	µm² s⁻¹	µm² s⁻¹	µm² s⁻¹
1	5	4.5	3.3	0.096
2	6.7	2.0	1.3	0.117
3	9.2	4.0	2.5	0.075
4	5.3	1.4	1.3	0.117
5	nd	nd	3.4	0.062
6	5	3.7	nd	0.074
7	11.5	1.0	1.4	0.033
8	9.9	nd	1.6	0.083
9	3.45	nd	2.0	0.050
mean ± SEM	7.0 ± 1.0	2.8 ± 0.5^a^b	2.1 ± 0.3^a^b	0.079 ± 0.009^b

Difference between D_CC obtained by flux method and that obtained from the 1-D rod model was not significant (P = 0.21).

Differences between D_CC measured by either method and D_OS were significant at the P = 0.01 level.