| . | 2017–2018 . | 2018–2019 . |
|---|---|---|
| % F among all reviews | 21.6 | 34.8 |
| % papers with F reviewers | 49.2 | 78.0 |
| % F senior authors | 17.6 | 26.8 |
| Average # reviews per male reviewer | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Average # reviews per female reviewer | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| % young investigators among all reviews | 13.4 | 11.9 |
| Days from editor assignment to reviewers secured (all manuscript types) | 3.1 | 2.4 |
| Days to first decision after review (original research) | 32.6 | 31.8 |
| Days to first decision after review (all manuscript types) | 23 | 18.4 |
| Acceptance rate (original research) | 50.5 | 55.0 |
| # original research manuscripts reviewed | 129 | 102 |
| . | 2017–2018 . | 2018–2019 . |
|---|---|---|
| % F among all reviews | 21.6 | 34.8 |
| % papers with F reviewers | 49.2 | 78.0 |
| % F senior authors | 17.6 | 26.8 |
| Average # reviews per male reviewer | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Average # reviews per female reviewer | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| % young investigators among all reviews | 13.4 | 11.9 |
| Days from editor assignment to reviewers secured (all manuscript types) | 3.1 | 2.4 |
| Days to first decision after review (original research) | 32.6 | 31.8 |
| Days to first decision after review (all manuscript types) | 23 | 18.4 |
| Acceptance rate (original research) | 50.5 | 55.0 |
| # original research manuscripts reviewed | 129 | 102 |
F, female. Gender identity was determined through first-hand knowledge or Google image searches with no attempt made to identify nonbinary individuals. Individuals whose gender presentation was unknown and whose image could not be found constituted <5% of the reviewer population and were excluded from analysis.