Table 2.
Development assays in various conditions
UndevelopedDevelopedPolyspermicn
 % % %  
Control 3 ± 2 97 ± 2 13 ± 3 
10 μM Gd 5 ± 5 95 ± 5 10 ± 7 
20 μM SK&F 96365 23 ± 11 77 ± 11 16 ± 7 
Control 46 ± 15 54 ± 15 13 ± 4 
500 nM Xestospongin C 32 ± 8 68 ± 8 34 ± 6 
Control 6 ± 5 94 ± 5 8 ± 4 
100 μM 2-APB 19 ± 10 81 ± 10 69 ± 17 
Control 18 ± 9 82 ± 9 11 ± 7 
1 μM U73343 26 ± 16 74 ± 16 12 ± 3 
1 μM U73122 35 ± 13 65 ± 13 60 ± 11 
UndevelopedDevelopedPolyspermicn
 % % %  
Control 3 ± 2 97 ± 2 13 ± 3 
10 μM Gd 5 ± 5 95 ± 5 10 ± 7 
20 μM SK&F 96365 23 ± 11 77 ± 11 16 ± 7 
Control 46 ± 15 54 ± 15 13 ± 4 
500 nM Xestospongin C 32 ± 8 68 ± 8 34 ± 6 
Control 6 ± 5 94 ± 5 8 ± 4 
100 μM 2-APB 19 ± 10 81 ± 10 69 ± 17 
Control 18 ± 9 82 ± 9 11 ± 7 
1 μM U73343 26 ± 16 74 ± 16 12 ± 3 
1 μM U73122 35 ± 13 65 ± 13 60 ± 11 

Mean ± SEM are reported. Out of the zygotes that initiated embryonic development, embryos were categorized as monospermic or polyspermic based on cleavage furrow symmetry. Control development for Xestospongin C was MR/3 with 2% DMSO.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal