Table 2. F CDF calculated from F 96–100... | Rockefeller University Press

Table 2.

F_CDF calculated from F_96–100 for I_Ca and I_Ba from 100-Hz protocol

Construct	F_96-100 for I_Ca	F_96-100 for I_Ba	P-value, I_Ca vs. I_Ba^{^a}	F_CDF	P-value vs. Ca_v2.1^{^b}	P-value vs. Ca_v2.2a^{^b}
Ca_v2.1	1.33 ± 0.03 (10)	1.06 ± 0.02 (12)	<0.001	0.27 ± 0.03 (10)		<0.001
Ca_v2.2 e37b	0.91 ± 0.03 (10)	0.83 ± 0.02 (11)	0.067	0.07 ± 0.03 (10)	<0.001	0.360
Ca_v2.2 e37a	0.89 ± 0.02 (10)	0.88 ± 0.04 (10)	0.970	−0.01 ± 0.02 (10)	<0.001
Ca_v2.2e37a Δ46 (10 mM)	0.95 ± 0.03 (12)	0.83 ± 0.03 (10)	0.005	0.12 ± 0.03 (12)	0.002	0.028
Ca_v2.2e37a Δ46 (0.5 mM)	0.82 ± 0.04 (10)	0.82 ± 0.03 (10)	0.968	0.00 ± 0.04 (10)	<0.001	1.000
Ca_v2.2e37b Δ46 (10 mM)	0.94 ± 0.03 (8)	0.94 ± 0.02 (4)	0.985	0.00 ± 0.03 (8)	<0.001	1.000
Ca_v2.2e37b Δ46 (0.5 mM)	0.86 ± 0.04 (5)	0.88 ± 0.02 (5)	0.646	−0.02 ± 0.04 (5)	<0.001	0.985

Construct	F_96-100 for I_Ca	F_96-100 for I_Ba	P-value, I_Ca vs. I_Ba^{^a}	F_CDF	P-value vs. Ca_v2.1^{^b}	P-value vs. Ca_v2.2a^{^b}
Ca_v2.1	1.33 ± 0.03 (10)	1.06 ± 0.02 (12)	<0.001	0.27 ± 0.03 (10)		<0.001
Ca_v2.2 e37b	0.91 ± 0.03 (10)	0.83 ± 0.02 (11)	0.067	0.07 ± 0.03 (10)	<0.001	0.360
Ca_v2.2 e37a	0.89 ± 0.02 (10)	0.88 ± 0.04 (10)	0.970	−0.01 ± 0.02 (10)	<0.001
Ca_v2.2e37a Δ46 (10 mM)	0.95 ± 0.03 (12)	0.83 ± 0.03 (10)	0.005	0.12 ± 0.03 (12)	0.002	0.028
Ca_v2.2e37a Δ46 (0.5 mM)	0.82 ± 0.04 (10)	0.82 ± 0.03 (10)	0.968	0.00 ± 0.04 (10)	<0.001	1.000
Ca_v2.2e37b Δ46 (10 mM)	0.94 ± 0.03 (8)	0.94 ± 0.02 (4)	0.985	0.00 ± 0.03 (8)	<0.001	1.000
Ca_v2.2e37b Δ46 (0.5 mM)	0.86 ± 0.04 (5)	0.88 ± 0.02 (5)	0.646	−0.02 ± 0.04 (5)	<0.001	0.985

F_CDF and F_96-100 (mean ± SEM) were determined as indicated in the text. Number of cells in parentheses.

Determined by Student’s t test.

Determined by one-way ANOVA test and post-hoc Dunnett's test.