Table 1. F CDF and P2/P1 for I Ca and I... | Rockefeller University Press

Table 1.

F_CDF and P2/P1 for I_Ca and I_Ba from double-pulse protocol (20-mV prepulse)

Construct	P2/P1 for I_Ca	P2/P1 for I_Ba	P-value, I_Ca vs. I_Ba^{^a}	F_CDF	P-value vs. Ca_v2.1^{^b}	P-value vs. Ca_v2.2a^{^b}
Ca_v2.1	1.40 ± 0.07 (5)	1.11 ± 0.02 (7)	0.002	0.28 ± 0.07 (5)		0.032
Ca_v2.2 e37b	1.28 ± 0.06 (10)	1.35 ± 0.01 (5)	0.437	−0.07 ± 0.06 (10)	0.015	1.000
Ca_v2.2 e37a	1.39 ± 0.06 (8)	1.38 ± 0.04 (6)	0.232	0.01 ± 0.06 (7)	0.032
Ca_v2.2-CT_2.1	1.65 ± 0.10 (13)	1.32 ± 0.04 (11)	0.009	0.33 ± 0.10 (13)	1.000	0.019
Ca_v2.1-CT_2.2	1.16 ± 0.10 (4)	1.16 ± 0.02 (5)	0.717	0.00 ± 0.10 (4)	0.035	1.000

Construct	P2/P1 for I_Ca	P2/P1 for I_Ba	P-value, I_Ca vs. I_Ba^{^a}	F_CDF	P-value vs. Ca_v2.1^{^b}	P-value vs. Ca_v2.2a^{^b}
Ca_v2.1	1.40 ± 0.07 (5)	1.11 ± 0.02 (7)	0.002	0.28 ± 0.07 (5)		0.032
Ca_v2.2 e37b	1.28 ± 0.06 (10)	1.35 ± 0.01 (5)	0.437	−0.07 ± 0.06 (10)	0.015	1.000
Ca_v2.2 e37a	1.39 ± 0.06 (8)	1.38 ± 0.04 (6)	0.232	0.01 ± 0.06 (7)	0.032
Ca_v2.2-CT_2.1	1.65 ± 0.10 (13)	1.32 ± 0.04 (11)	0.009	0.33 ± 0.10 (13)	1.000	0.019
Ca_v2.1-CT_2.2	1.16 ± 0.10 (4)	1.16 ± 0.02 (5)	0.717	0.00 ± 0.10 (4)	0.035	1.000

F_CDF and P2/P1 (mean ± SEM) were determined as indicated in the text. Number of cells in parentheses.

Determined by Student’s t test.

Determined by Kruskal–Wallis test and post-hoc Dunn’s test.