Table 1.

Charge movement and Ca2+ release fit parameters

Construct Q-V ΔF/F-V 
 Qmax VQ kQ ΔF/Fmax VF kF 
 nC/µF mV mV ΔF/F mV mV 
YFP 22.8 ± 3.4 (5) −7.8 ± 3.5 12.0 ± 1.7 1.6 ± 0.2 (6) −13.0 ± 1.2 8.4 ± 0.8 
V-Rem 22.4 ± 1.2 (7) −8.1 ± 1.6 11.8 ± 1.6 0.6 ± 0.1a (8) −20.2 ± 4.7 14.7 ± 2.6 
V-Rem AAA 24.6 ± 3.4 (5) −8.5 ± 1.0 8.1 ± 1.0 1.4 ± 0.2 (6) −15.5 ± 1.3 9.9 ± 0.9 
Construct Q-V ΔF/F-V 
 Qmax VQ kQ ΔF/Fmax VF kF 
 nC/µF mV mV ΔF/F mV mV 
YFP 22.8 ± 3.4 (5) −7.8 ± 3.5 12.0 ± 1.7 1.6 ± 0.2 (6) −13.0 ± 1.2 8.4 ± 0.8 
V-Rem 22.4 ± 1.2 (7) −8.1 ± 1.6 11.8 ± 1.6 0.6 ± 0.1a (8) −20.2 ± 4.7 14.7 ± 2.6 
V-Rem AAA 24.6 ± 3.4 (5) −8.5 ± 1.0 8.1 ± 1.0 1.4 ± 0.2 (6) −15.5 ± 1.3 9.9 ± 0.9 

Data are given as mean ± SEM, with the numbers in parentheses indicating the number of FDB fibers tested. Charge movement and EC coupling data were fit by Eqs. 1 and 3, respectively. Only cells with Ca2+ transients that could be fit with Eq. 3 were used for analysis; two Rem-expressing fibers lacking quantifiable ΔF/F were dropped. One significant difference between the three groups is indicated.

a

P < 0.001; one-way ANOVA.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal