Table 1.

Effects of Cd2+ on the amplitude and voltage dependence of the various homomeric and heteromeric channels

Channel V50 V50Cd ICda 
 mV mV  
WT Q2 −20.0 ± 2.3 (23) −22.7 ± 2.4 (23) 0.80 ± 0.04 (23) 
S195C Q2 1.4 ± 1.6b (7) — 0.09 ± 0.02b (7) 
R198C Q2 −0.8 ± 2.6b (7) — 0.09 ± 0.02b (7) 
R201C Q2 — — 0.12 ± 0.02b (6) 
C106A Q2 −35.2 ± 1.4b (5) −35.9 ± 4.0b (5) 0.92 ± 0.10 (5) 
C242A Q2 −31.1 ± 1.5b (6) −29.8 ± 1.5b (6) 0.92 ± 0.04 (6) 
C242A-S195C Q2 −6.8 ± 0.7 (7) — 0.10 ± 0.03b (7) 
C242A-R198C Q2 5.2 ± 0.3 (6) — 0.07 ± 0.01b (6) 
C242A-R201C Q2 — — 0.12 ± 0.02b (5) 
C106A-S195C Q2 −15.2 ± 0.5 (5) −28.9 ± 1.1 (5) 0.64 ± 0.05c (5) 
C106A-R198C Q2 −9.4 ± 0.3b (5) −22.3 ± 0.3 (5) 0.71 ± 0.08c (5) 
C106A-R201C Q2 — — 0.72 ± 0.07c (5) 
WT Q2/WT Q3 −34.3 ± 4.3 (7) −32.4 ± 4.2 (7) 0.98 ± 0.21 (7) 
R198C Q2/WT Q3 −18.8 ± 1.5b (7) — 0.16 ± 0.05b (7) 
C106A-R198C Q2/WT Q3 −23.8 ± 3.8b (6) −25.3 ± 3.5b (6) 0.97 ± 0.03 (6) 
R198C Q2/C136A Q3 −12.2 ± 0.3b (7) — 0.28 ± 0.07b (7) 
WT Q2/C136A Q3 −38.8 ± 3.0 (6) −40.1 ± 3.2 (6) 0.96 ± 0.14 (6) 
Con WT Q2 −26.3 ± 1.3 (7) −24.6 ± 1.7 (7) 0.99 ± 0.05 (7) 
Con Q2 D1 R198C −19.4 ± 0.7b (7) −25.7 ± 0.4 (7) 0.40 ± 0.06b (7) 
Con Q2 D1 R198C, D2C106A −21.1 ± 0.8 (7) −30.6 ± 0.6 (7) 0.32 ± 0.05b (7) 
Con Q2 D1 C106A, R198C −23.8 ± 0.6 (7) −25.5 ± 0.4 (7) 0.75 ± 0.16 (7) 
Channel V50 V50Cd ICda 
 mV mV  
WT Q2 −20.0 ± 2.3 (23) −22.7 ± 2.4 (23) 0.80 ± 0.04 (23) 
S195C Q2 1.4 ± 1.6b (7) — 0.09 ± 0.02b (7) 
R198C Q2 −0.8 ± 2.6b (7) — 0.09 ± 0.02b (7) 
R201C Q2 — — 0.12 ± 0.02b (6) 
C106A Q2 −35.2 ± 1.4b (5) −35.9 ± 4.0b (5) 0.92 ± 0.10 (5) 
C242A Q2 −31.1 ± 1.5b (6) −29.8 ± 1.5b (6) 0.92 ± 0.04 (6) 
C242A-S195C Q2 −6.8 ± 0.7 (7) — 0.10 ± 0.03b (7) 
C242A-R198C Q2 5.2 ± 0.3 (6) — 0.07 ± 0.01b (6) 
C242A-R201C Q2 — — 0.12 ± 0.02b (5) 
C106A-S195C Q2 −15.2 ± 0.5 (5) −28.9 ± 1.1 (5) 0.64 ± 0.05c (5) 
C106A-R198C Q2 −9.4 ± 0.3b (5) −22.3 ± 0.3 (5) 0.71 ± 0.08c (5) 
C106A-R201C Q2 — — 0.72 ± 0.07c (5) 
WT Q2/WT Q3 −34.3 ± 4.3 (7) −32.4 ± 4.2 (7) 0.98 ± 0.21 (7) 
R198C Q2/WT Q3 −18.8 ± 1.5b (7) — 0.16 ± 0.05b (7) 
C106A-R198C Q2/WT Q3 −23.8 ± 3.8b (6) −25.3 ± 3.5b (6) 0.97 ± 0.03 (6) 
R198C Q2/C136A Q3 −12.2 ± 0.3b (7) — 0.28 ± 0.07b (7) 
WT Q2/C136A Q3 −38.8 ± 3.0 (6) −40.1 ± 3.2 (6) 0.96 ± 0.14 (6) 
Con WT Q2 −26.3 ± 1.3 (7) −24.6 ± 1.7 (7) 0.99 ± 0.05 (7) 
Con Q2 D1 R198C −19.4 ± 0.7b (7) −25.7 ± 0.4 (7) 0.40 ± 0.06b (7) 
Con Q2 D1 R198C, D2C106A −21.1 ± 0.8 (7) −30.6 ± 0.6 (7) 0.32 ± 0.05b (7) 
Con Q2 D1 C106A, R198C −23.8 ± 0.6 (7) −25.5 ± 0.4 (7) 0.75 ± 0.16 (7) 

In transfected CHO cells perfused without or with 100 µM Cd2+, currents were evoked from a holding potential of −90 mV by depolarizing steps from −110 to 30 mV in 10-mV increments and repolarized to −60 mV. Conductance–voltage relations were constructed and data were fitted to a single Boltzmann function to yield the V50 values. The values in parentheses correspond to the number of cells examined. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.

a

The change in current amplitude was expressed as a ratio ICd of the current measured in the same cell at 30 mV after and before Cd2+ application.

b

Statistically different from the WT KCNQ2 value, calculated by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test, assuming equal variances; P < 0.01.

c

Statistically different from the single KCNQ2 mutant S195C, R198C, and R201C values; P < 0.01.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal