Table 2.

Comparison of the effects of mutations at positions 537 and 538 on closed- and open-state stability

537 Parameter  538  
  
 C WT O 
 ΔG0 2.7 −8.4 (2 s), −10.5 (10 s) −26.5 
 ΔΔG0 13.2  −18.1 
 ΔΔG0,NA    
 C C O 
 ΔG0 −0.9 −2.6 −17.1 
 ΔΔG0 9.5 5.8 −8.7 
 ΔΔG0,NA 11.5  3.6 
 C NA O 
 ΔG0 −3.0 −4.5 −17.7 
 ΔΔG0 7.4 3.9 −9.3 
 ΔΔG0,NA 11.7  4.9 
537 Parameter  538  
  
 C WT O 
 ΔG0 2.7 −8.4 (2 s), −10.5 (10 s) −26.5 
 ΔΔG0 13.2  −18.1 
 ΔΔG0,NA    
 C C O 
 ΔG0 −0.9 −2.6 −17.1 
 ΔΔG0 9.5 5.8 −8.7 
 ΔΔG0,NA 11.5  3.6 
 C NA O 
 ΔG0 −3.0 −4.5 −17.7 
 ΔΔG0 7.4 3.9 −9.3 
 ΔΔG0,NA 11.7  4.9 

Letters (C/O) within cells indicate whether the combination of residues at 537 (rows) and 538 (columns) resulted in a stabilization of the closed or open state, relative to WT hERG. For ease of comparison, the mean values for ΔG0, ΔΔG0, and ΔΔG0,NA (in kJ mol−1) are also shown. Refer to Table 1 for full details, including n values and SEM.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal