Summary of thermodynamic methods applied to Schemes 2–5
| Quantity | Global analysis | Local (Hill) analysis |
| Equilibrium curve | Q-V (Q = N〈q〉) | G-V (G = N〈g〉) |
| Canonical relation | a | |
| “Bridge” equation | Φ = −kTlnZ | ηL (= ΔGL − ΔqLV) = −kTlnLb |
| Work function | ||
| CPF ratios | = 〈CE〉μ | = 〈C〉μ , = 〈D〉Vc |
| Allosteric energies | μΔWC[q] = −4(ΔWC + ΔWE) = −ΔqT μΔVM | μΔWH[g]V(±) = −4ΔWC |
| VΔ(WH[g] + ηL)μ(±) = −4ΔWDd |
| Quantity | Global analysis | Local (Hill) analysis |
| Equilibrium curve | Q-V (Q = N〈q〉) | G-V (G = N〈g〉) |
| Canonical relation | a | |
| “Bridge” equation | Φ = −kTlnZ | ηL (= ΔGL − ΔqLV) = −kTlnLb |
| Work function | ||
| CPF ratios | = 〈CE〉μ | = 〈C〉μ , = 〈D〉Vc |
| Allosteric energies | μΔWC[q] = −4(ΔWC + ΔWE) = −ΔqT μΔVM | μΔWH[g]V(±) = −4ΔWC |
| VΔ(WH[g] + ηL)μ(±) = −4ΔWDd |
Some of the local equations for Scheme 5 differ from those of the other schemes as a result of the tetrameric pore structure. The following equations become relevant at extreme voltages, where Scheme 5 deviates from Scheme 4 (Fig. 12, C and D):
Canonical relation:
“Bridge” equation: ηP (= ηL/4) = −kTlnP.
Allosteric energies: μΔWH[g]V(±) = −ΔWC and VΔ(WH[g] + ηP)μ(±) = −(ΔWD + ΔWB3 + ΔWB4) + kTln[16x1(1−x3)].