Table 1.

Effect of electrical stimulation on total contents of K+ and Na+ in isolated rat EDL muscle in vitro

Experimental conditions Total K+ content Total Na+ content 
 µmol/g wet wt µmol/g wet wt 
Resting muscles 103.7 ± 2.1 (9) 13.6 ± 1.0 (9) 
5-Hz stimulation, 300 s 98.2 ± 0.9 (9)a 18.2 ± 0.6 (9)b 
Resting muscles 102.8 ± 1.9 (5) 11.8 ± 0.6 (5) 
60-Hz stimulation, 60 s 92.8 ± 1.9 (5)c 21.6 ± 0.4 (5)d 
Experimental conditions Total K+ content Total Na+ content 
 µmol/g wet wt µmol/g wet wt 
Resting muscles 103.7 ± 2.1 (9) 13.6 ± 1.0 (9) 
5-Hz stimulation, 300 s 98.2 ± 0.9 (9)a 18.2 ± 0.6 (9)b 
Resting muscles 102.8 ± 1.9 (5) 11.8 ± 0.6 (5) 
60-Hz stimulation, 60 s 92.8 ± 1.9 (5)c 21.6 ± 0.4 (5)d 

The muscles were mounted in force transducers for measurement of isometric contractions, adjusted to optimal length, and equilibrated for 30 min in KR buffer at 30°C during gassing with a mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Continuous direct stimulation was performed using 10-V, 1-ms pulses at 5 or 60 Hz. After stimulation, all muscles were immediately washed four times for 15 min in ice-cold Na+-free Tris-sucrose buffer, blotted, weighed, and taken for flame photometric determination of Na+ and K+ contents. The contralateral muscles from the same animals were allowed to rest, and their content of Na+ and K+ was compared with that of the stimulated muscles. All values are given as means ± SEM, with the number of muscles in parentheses.

a

P < 0.03 compared with resting muscles.

b

P < 0.002 compared with resting muscles.

c

P < 0.006 compared with resting muscles.

d

P < 0.001 compared with resting muscles.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal