Table I.

Functional outcome after stroke according to Tp53 Arg72Pro genotypes

Genotype Ischemic stroke ICH 
 Cohort 1 (P < 0.0001) Cohort 2 (P = 0.020) Cohort 1 (P < 0.0001) Cohort 2 (P = 0.004) 
 Good prognosis Poor prognosis Good prognosis Poor prognosis Good prognosis Poor prognosis Good prognosis Poor prognosis 
Arg/Arg 104 (44.3) 131 (55.7) 35 (57.4) 26 (42.6) 13 (19.4) 54 (80.6) 8 (26.7) 22 (73.3) 
Arg/Pro 117 (79.6) 30 (20.4) 27 (77.1) 8 (22.9) 49 (90.7) 5 (9.3) 12 (75.0) 4 (25.0) 
Pro/Pro 26 (100) 7 (100) 7 (100) 2 (100) 
Genotype Ischemic stroke ICH 
 Cohort 1 (P < 0.0001) Cohort 2 (P = 0.020) Cohort 1 (P < 0.0001) Cohort 2 (P = 0.004) 
 Good prognosis Poor prognosis Good prognosis Poor prognosis Good prognosis Poor prognosis Good prognosis Poor prognosis 
Arg/Arg 104 (44.3) 131 (55.7) 35 (57.4) 26 (42.6) 13 (19.4) 54 (80.6) 8 (26.7) 22 (73.3) 
Arg/Pro 117 (79.6) 30 (20.4) 27 (77.1) 8 (22.9) 49 (90.7) 5 (9.3) 12 (75.0) 4 (25.0) 
Pro/Pro 26 (100) 7 (100) 7 (100) 2 (100) 

Cohort 1: patients were admitted at the University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (Galicia, Spain). Cohort 2: patients were admitted at the University Hospital of Germans Trias i Pujol (Catalonia, Spain). Functional outcome was evaluated at 3 mo using the mRS. An mRS score >2 was considered poor prognosis. Data are numbers (%). Data were compared among genotype groups using the χ2 test.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal