Table 1. Mean and SEM for the data... | Rockefeller University Press

Table 1.

Mean and SEM for the data plotted in Fig. 4

Sample (n = 3)	Cells with >10-μm protrusions (%)	Cells with TNT-like protrusions (%)	Cells with one TNT-like protrusion (%)	Cells with more than one TNT-like protrusion (%)
GFP	24.23 ± 1.93	8.81 ± 2.92	8.36 ± 2.14	0.45 ± 0.78
Rhes WT	71.01 ± 6.49	36.29 ± 1.64	19.66 ± 1.72	16.93 ± 2.97
Rhes S33N	49.21 ± 1.16	10.25 ± 1.97	8.91 ± 1.76	1.33 ± 0.23
Rhes C263S	34.94 ± 5.48	10.78 ± 2.93	8.85 ± 2.68	1.92 ± 0.82
Rhes 1–171	48.64 ± 5.35	13.87 ± 0.75	10.65 ± 0.28	3.22 ± 0.60
Rhes 171–266	50.63 ± 7 0.69	27.29 ± 1.75	20.88 ± 2.07	6.30 ± 0.72

Sample (n = 3)	Cells with >10-μm protrusions (%)	Cells with TNT-like protrusions (%)	Cells with one TNT-like protrusion (%)	Cells with more than one TNT-like protrusion (%)
GFP	24.23 ± 1.93	8.81 ± 2.92	8.36 ± 2.14	0.45 ± 0.78
Rhes WT	71.01 ± 6.49	36.29 ± 1.64	19.66 ± 1.72	16.93 ± 2.97
Rhes S33N	49.21 ± 1.16	10.25 ± 1.97	8.91 ± 1.76	1.33 ± 0.23
Rhes C263S	34.94 ± 5.48	10.78 ± 2.93	8.85 ± 2.68	1.92 ± 0.82
Rhes 1–171	48.64 ± 5.35	13.87 ± 0.75	10.65 ± 0.28	3.22 ± 0.60
Rhes 171–266	50.63 ± 7 0.69	27.29 ± 1.75	20.88 ± 2.07	6.30 ± 0.72