| . | MT association . | Plus end–directed motility . | Plus end tracking . |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOD324 | − | − | − |
| NOD324CC | ++ | − | − |
| NOD485 | + | − | − |
| NOD485CC | ++ | + | + |
| NOD325-485 | − | − | − |
| NOD325-485-CC | ± | − | − |
| Kinesin-1 CC | ± | − | − |
| . | MT association . | Plus end–directed motility . | Plus end tracking . |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOD324 | − | − | − |
| NOD324CC | ++ | − | − |
| NOD485 | + | − | − |
| NOD485CC | ++ | + | + |
| NOD325-485 | − | − | − |
| NOD325-485-CC | ± | − | − |
| Kinesin-1 CC | ± | − | − |
CC, Kinesin-1 CC domain; −, not observed; ±, weak and variable localization to a subset of MTs; +, weak association; ++, strong association. Classifications were determined by live cell imaging. The ± constructs were designated as variable because they weakly localized to a subset of apparently bundled MTs in some interphase cells. MT association of NOD485 was designated as weak (+) because it was not retained after fixation with paraformaldehyde and permeabilization with detergent during preparations for immunofluorescence.