Table II.

CW Δ-mtDNA/FLP Δ-mtDNA colocalization in FC cells


ImageJ colocalization
Normalized colocalizationa
 % ± SD % 
WT 58 ± 10 (n = 14) 100 
FC I   
    Day 22 18 ± 7 (n = 10) 31 
    Day 32 3 ± 3 (n = 10) 
    Day 51 7 ± 9 (n = 10) 12 
    Day 59 11 ± 7 (n = 9) 19 
    Day 104 4 ± 3 (n = 10) 
    Day 274 2 ± 2 (n = 11) 
FC II   
    Day 22 16 ± 9 (n = 11) 28 
    Day 32 2 ± 4 (n = 10) 
    Day 60 2 ± 2 (n = 10) 
    Day 90 7 ± 4 (n = 9) 12 
    Day 120 7 ± 6 (n = 8) 12 
    Day 150 1 ± 2 (n = 10) 

ImageJ colocalization
Normalized colocalizationa
 % ± SD % 
WT 58 ± 10 (n = 14) 100 
FC I   
    Day 22 18 ± 7 (n = 10) 31 
    Day 32 3 ± 3 (n = 10) 
    Day 51 7 ± 9 (n = 10) 12 
    Day 59 11 ± 7 (n = 9) 19 
    Day 104 4 ± 3 (n = 10) 
    Day 274 2 ± 2 (n = 11) 
FC II   
    Day 22 16 ± 9 (n = 11) 28 
    Day 32 2 ± 4 (n = 10) 
    Day 60 2 ± 2 (n = 10) 
    Day 90 7 ± 4 (n = 9) 12 
    Day 120 7 ± 6 (n = 8) 12 
    Day 150 1 ± 2 (n = 10) 

Red and green images were thresholded to remove irrelevant pixel intensities (see Materials and methods) and the proportion of pixels carrying meaningful signal for both red and green were expressed as a percentage of the total. n = number of images analyzed for each timepoint (see Fig. 7 for examples).

a

Colocalization expressed as a percentage of WT colocalization.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal