Table 1. FLIM parameters found in... | Rockefeller University Press

Table 1.

FLIM parameters found in cross-sections

	FDB				Soleus
	τ₁ (ns)	τ₂ (ns)	Te (counts)	m, N	τ₁ (ns)	τ₂ (ns)	Te (counts)	m, N
Type I	0.49	3.16	317	22, 3	0.46	3.16	372.1	97, 3
S.E.M	0.007	0.03	29		0.004	0.01	17.1
p for types I vs. IIA	<0.001**	<0.001**	<0.001**		<0.001**	<0.001**	0.02*
Type IIA	0.67	3.46	143	48, 3	0.58	3.44	307.2	69, 3
SEM	0.008	0.03	32.6		0.003	0.01	22.2
p for types I vs. IIX	<0.001**	<0.001**	<0.001**		<0.001**	<0.001**	0.07
Type IIX	0.65	3.55	221	43, 3	0.56	3.46	436	65, 3
SEM	0.01	0.02	15		0.004	0.01	30.6
p for types IIA vs. IIX	0.53	0.01*	<0.001**		0.002*	0.81	0.002*

	FDB				Soleus
	τ₁ (ns)	τ₂ (ns)	Te (counts)	m, N	τ₁ (ns)	τ₂ (ns)	Te (counts)	m, N
Type I	0.49	3.16	317	22, 3	0.46	3.16	372.1	97, 3
S.E.M	0.007	0.03	29		0.004	0.01	17.1
p for types I vs. IIA	<0.001**	<0.001**	<0.001**		<0.001**	<0.001**	0.02*
Type IIA	0.67	3.46	143	48, 3	0.58	3.44	307.2	69, 3
SEM	0.008	0.03	32.6		0.003	0.01	22.2
p for types I vs. IIX	<0.001**	<0.001**	<0.001**		<0.001**	<0.001**	0.07
Type IIX	0.65	3.55	221	43, 3	0.56	3.46	436	65, 3
SEM	0.01	0.02	15		0.004	0.01	30.6
p for types IIA vs. IIX	0.53	0.01*	<0.001**		0.002*	0.81	0.002*

Quantitative outcomes of the analysis of FLIM data, defined in Materials and methods. The p’s are probabilities of no difference in the comparison listed, calculated by nested analysis. Asterisks mark changes statistically significant at the <0.05 (*) and <0.001 (**) level.

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable