Table 3.

P values for data in Figs. 7, and 8 

VOLTAGE (mV):−120−100−80−60−40−20020406080
BL vs. ACh
Vehicle <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0001 0.9360 0.0036 0.0004 0.0002 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 
Tram/AP 0.9018 0.8199 0.9510 0.9995 0.9131 0.8718 0.8502 0.8353 0.8317 0.8245 0.7961 
PcTX1 0.8247 0.8242 0.9230 0.9596 0.6034 0.4723 0.4186 0.3843 0.3591 0.3803 0.3697 
BL: Veh vs. 
Tram/AP 0.0478 0.0565 0.1170 0.9360 0.7679 0.1394 0.0582 0.0309 0.0146 0.0054 0.0017 
PcTX1 0.9996 0.9431 0.8851 0.9995 0.8938 0.363 0.2181 0.173 0.1455 0.1734 0.2547 
ACh: Veh vs. 
Tram/AP <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.8409 0.0168 0.0006 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 
PcTX1 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.8680 0.0119 0.0004 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 
BL vs. MitTx 0.0004 0.0021 0.0111 0.8656 0.1122 0.1051 0.1349 0.1016 0.0635 0.0476 0.0348 
MitTx: Veh vs. 
Tram/AP 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 0.1121 0.0742 0.0394 0.0283 0.0230 0.0200 0.0247 0.0216 
PcTX1 0.0055 0.0098 0.0130 0.3158 0.1998 0.1108 0.0791 0.0579 0.0440 0.0465 0.0380 
VOLTAGE (mV):−120−100−80−60−40−20020406080
BL vs. ACh
Vehicle <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0001 0.9360 0.0036 0.0004 0.0002 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 
Tram/AP 0.9018 0.8199 0.9510 0.9995 0.9131 0.8718 0.8502 0.8353 0.8317 0.8245 0.7961 
PcTX1 0.8247 0.8242 0.9230 0.9596 0.6034 0.4723 0.4186 0.3843 0.3591 0.3803 0.3697 
BL: Veh vs. 
Tram/AP 0.0478 0.0565 0.1170 0.9360 0.7679 0.1394 0.0582 0.0309 0.0146 0.0054 0.0017 
PcTX1 0.9996 0.9431 0.8851 0.9995 0.8938 0.363 0.2181 0.173 0.1455 0.1734 0.2547 
ACh: Veh vs. 
Tram/AP <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.8409 0.0168 0.0006 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 
PcTX1 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.8680 0.0119 0.0004 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 
BL vs. MitTx 0.0004 0.0021 0.0111 0.8656 0.1122 0.1051 0.1349 0.1016 0.0635 0.0476 0.0348 
MitTx: Veh vs. 
Tram/AP 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 0.1121 0.0742 0.0394 0.0283 0.0230 0.0200 0.0247 0.0216 
PcTX1 0.0055 0.0098 0.0130 0.3158 0.1998 0.1108 0.0791 0.0579 0.0440 0.0465 0.0380 

Data represent biological replicates and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. The two-way ANOVA revealed that there was a statistically significant interaction (P < 0.0001) between factors. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were analyzed between individual groups using Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. P < 0.05 (bold text) is considered significantly different.

View Large
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal