Table 2.

P values for data in Fig. 6 

Log [ACh] (M):−9−8.5−8−7.5−7−6.5−6−5.5−5
Veh vs. L-NNA, Indo 0.6386 0.1156 0.091 0.0012 0.0169 0.0097 0.0441 0.0426 0.0432 
All in the presence of L-NNA, Indo 
Veh vs. PcTX1 0.9697 0.3630 0.9712 0.4479 0.9744 0.6251 0.0184 0.0086 0.0116 
Veh vs. Tram/AP 0.7449 0.5454 0.9996 0.5537 0.5960 0.3092 0.0426 0.0437 0.0169 
PcTX1 vs. Tram/AP 0.7875 0.9744 0.9909 0.9752 0.5357 0.6873 0.9069 0.4692 0.7627 
Repeated-measures, BL vs. 10−9to 10−5[ACh] (indicates [ACh] affect on diameter) 
Vehicle 0.8836 0.8285 0.4802 0.0145 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 
L-NNA, Indo 0.2808 0.6559 0.6334 0.9374 0.5581 0.0130 0.0122 0.0232 0.0285 
L-NNA, Indo, PcTX1 0.4846 0.3019 0.9983 0.9022 0.7495 0.2803 0.5386 0.9878 0.8413 
L-NNA, Indo, Tram/AP 0.9370 0.9979 0.9880 0.9998 0.9932 0.1773 0.1307 0.3101 0.3972 
Log [ACh] (M):−9−8.5−8−7.5−7−6.5−6−5.5−5
Veh vs. L-NNA, Indo 0.6386 0.1156 0.091 0.0012 0.0169 0.0097 0.0441 0.0426 0.0432 
All in the presence of L-NNA, Indo 
Veh vs. PcTX1 0.9697 0.3630 0.9712 0.4479 0.9744 0.6251 0.0184 0.0086 0.0116 
Veh vs. Tram/AP 0.7449 0.5454 0.9996 0.5537 0.5960 0.3092 0.0426 0.0437 0.0169 
PcTX1 vs. Tram/AP 0.7875 0.9744 0.9909 0.9752 0.5357 0.6873 0.9069 0.4692 0.7627 
Repeated-measures, BL vs. 10−9to 10−5[ACh] (indicates [ACh] affect on diameter) 
Vehicle 0.8836 0.8285 0.4802 0.0145 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 
L-NNA, Indo 0.2808 0.6559 0.6334 0.9374 0.5581 0.0130 0.0122 0.0232 0.0285 
L-NNA, Indo, PcTX1 0.4846 0.3019 0.9983 0.9022 0.7495 0.2803 0.5386 0.9878 0.8413 
L-NNA, Indo, Tram/AP 0.9370 0.9979 0.9880 0.9998 0.9932 0.1773 0.1307 0.3101 0.3972 

Data represent biological replicates and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. The two-way ANOVA revealed that there was a statistically significant interaction (P < 0.0001) between factors. Post hoc pairwise comparisons were analyzed between individual groups using Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. P < 0.05 (bold text) is considered significantly different.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal