TABLE III.

Endogenous channel RIV fingerprint is evident in SLC26A9 + ΔF508CFTR coexpressing HEK 293 cells

Construct Time 
 60 s 240 s 420 s 
GFP(± fsk, n.s.)a 1.27 ± 0.09 1.28 ± 0.09 1.29 ± 0.11 
wtCFTR (no fsk) 1.27 ± 0.15 1.36 ± 0.11 ntb 
wtCFTR(3 min fsk at 240 s) 1.30 ± 0.05 0.98 ± 0.01c 0.95 ± 0.01c 
SLC26A9 + ΔF508CFTR(3 min fsk at 240 s) 1.20 ± 0.05 1.20 ± 0.07 1.27 ± 0.08 
Construct Time 
 60 s 240 s 420 s 
GFP(± fsk, n.s.)a 1.27 ± 0.09 1.28 ± 0.09 1.29 ± 0.11 
wtCFTR (no fsk) 1.27 ± 0.15 1.36 ± 0.11 ntb 
wtCFTR(3 min fsk at 240 s) 1.30 ± 0.05 0.98 ± 0.01c 0.95 ± 0.01c 
SLC26A9 + ΔF508CFTR(3 min fsk at 240 s) 1.20 ± 0.05 1.20 ± 0.07 1.27 ± 0.08 
a

GFP-alone constructs did not demonstrate significant differences in RIV in the presence or absence of forskolin stimulation, and the data are pooled.

b

nt, not tested.

c

P < 0.01 compared to same time point in other constructs.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal