Rockefeller University Press

Skip to Main Content

Table I

Global CD4 and CD8 T cell response patterns

		Patients responding to
Responding T cell subset		pp65 pool	IE-1 pool
CD4 T cells		23 (85%)	11 (41%)^{^a}
Median frequencies (range)	day 0	0.27 (0.02–17.23)	0.04 (0.01–0.16)
In % of total CD4 T cells	3–4 mo	0.28 (0.03–16.89)	0.08 (0.05–0.19)
Response was dominant in^{^b}		22	0
CD8 T cells		27 (100%)	20 (74%)
Median frequencies (range)	day 0	0.44 (0.02–8.06)	0.97 (0.01–10.81)
In % of total CD8 T cells	3–4 mo	0.55 (0.04–13.01)	1.05 (0.03–15.47)
Response was dominant in^{^b}		17	9

		Patients responding to
Responding T cell subset		pp65 pool	IE-1 pool
CD4 T cells		23 (85%)	11 (41%)^{^a}
Median frequencies (range)	day 0	0.27 (0.02–17.23)	0.04 (0.01–0.16)
In % of total CD4 T cells	3–4 mo	0.28 (0.03–16.89)	0.08 (0.05–0.19)
Response was dominant in^{^b}		22	0
CD8 T cells		27 (100%)	20 (74%)
Median frequencies (range)	day 0	0.44 (0.02–8.06)	0.97 (0.01–10.81)
In % of total CD8 T cells	3–4 mo	0.55 (0.04–13.01)	1.05 (0.03–15.47)
Response was dominant in^{^b}		17	9

^a

In most donors, this response was not observed at all time points.

^b

In one case, no clear dominance of either response was observed.