Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is an RNA-binding protein prominently expressed in neurons. Missense mutations or complete loss of FMRP can potentially lead to fragile X syndrome, a common form of inherited intellectual disability. In addition to RNA regulation, FMRP was also proposed to modulate neuronal function by direct interaction with the large conductance Ca2+- and voltage-activated potassium channel (BK) β4 regulatory subunits (BKβ4). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying FMRP regulation of BK channels were not studied in detail. We have used electrophysiology and super-resolution stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) to characterize the effects of FMRP on pore-forming BKα subunits, as well as the association with regulatory subunits BKβ4. Our data indicate that, in the absence of coexpressed β4, FMRP alters the steady-state properties of BKα channels by decreasing channel activation and deactivation rates. Analysis using the Horrigan-Aldrich model revealed alterations in the parameters associated with channel opening (L0) and voltage sensor activation (J0). Interestingly, FMRP also altered the biophysical properties of BKαβ4 channels favoring channel opening, although not as dramatically as BKα. STORM experiments revealed clustered multi-protein complexes, consistent with FMRP interacting not only to BKαβ4 but also to BKα. Lastly, we found that a partial loss-of-function mutation in FMRP (R138Q) counteracts many of its functional effects on BKα and BKαβ4 channels. In summary, our data show that FMRP modulates the function of both BKα and BKαβ4 channels.
The large conductance Ca2+-activated potassium (BK) channels are formed by the tetrameric association of channel-forming α subunits that are encoded by the Slo1 or KCNMA1 gene (Atkinson et al., 1991; Butler et al., 1993). Each BKα subunit is formed by a transmembrane core (S0–S6) and a large cytoplasmic domain containing binding sites for Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions (for a recent review, see Latorre et al., 2017). The diversity of BKα channels is conferred by their association with auxiliary β(1–4) subunits (Knaus et al., 1994; Wallner et al., 1999; Xia et al., 1999; Behrens et al., 2000; Brenner et al., 2000; Uebele et al., 2000). Three main populations of BK channels have been found in central neurons: the noninactivating iberiotoxin-sensitive, fast-gated “type I” channels, which are formed by BKα subunits; the noninactivating iberiotoxin-resistant, slow-gated, type II channels, formed by BKαβ4 complexes; and the iberiotoxin-sensitive inactivating channels including (but not limited to) BKαβ2 complexes (Reinhart et al., 1989; Bielefeldt et al., 1992; Reinhart and Levitan, 1995; Meera et al., 2000; Faber and Sah, 2003; Whitt et al., 2016). These associations alter BK channel activation and inactivation properties, subcellular trafficking, and pharmacology (Kshatri et al., 2018). As physiological controllers of K+ efflux timing and duration, BK channels are implicated in a multitude of roles in the central nervous system including regulation of neuronal action potential (AP) shape, firing frequency, and control of neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals (Robitaille and Charlton, 1992; Robitaille et al., 1993).
The fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is an RNA-binding protein that regulates translation (Wang et al., 2012), potentially affecting hundreds of mRNAs (Brown et al., 2001; Darnell et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2014). FMRP is encoded by the FMR1 gene, which is expressed in many tissues and at high levels in neurons (Devys et al., 1993; Fähling et al., 2009). The complete loss of FMRP leads to fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most common form of inherited intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders (Willemsen et al., 2003; Bear et al., 2004; Bagni and Greenough, 2005). Point mutations (R138Q) or partial deletions in FMRP also lead to FXS (Bassell and Warren, 2008; Myrick et al., 2015). Besides FMRP’s role in RNA regulation, several studies have shown that it directly interacts with presynaptic voltage-gated ion channels, regulating the gating of sodium-activated potassium channels (Slo2.2; Brown et al., 2010) and surface expression of N-type voltage-gated calcium channels (CaV2.2; Ferron et al., 2014). In addition, FMRP has been proposed to modulate BK channels in hippocampal and cortical excitatory neurons, regulating neurotransmitter release and synaptic transmission (Deng et al., 2013). Another study by the same group demonstrated that FMRP increases the open probability and modulates the gating kinetics of BKαβ4 channels in CA3 pyramidal neurons (Deng and Klyachko, 2016). Interestingly, in that same work, the authors also showed that genetic up-regulation of BK channels through β4 deletion was sufficient to normalize the neuronal defects in the FMRP knockout mice model. The modulation of BK channel function by FMRP has been proposed to occur through interaction with the accessory β4 subunits, although the effect of FMRP on BKα-only channels was not directly addressed (Deng et al., 2013). A separate study including biochemical assays in whole mouse brain showed that FMRP could independently bind to both BKα and β4 subunits (Myrick et al., 2015), hinting that BKα may be directly modulated by FMRP.
To better understand the regulation of BK channels by FMRP, we investigated its effects on the biophysical characteristics of BKα channels with or without β4 accessory subunits in heterologous expression systems. Physical proximity between FMRP and BK channel components was addressed using super-resolution stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Our results demonstrate that FMRP interacts with and modulates the biophysical properties of BKα channels and, although to a lesser extent, BKαβ4 channels. No effects were observed in the presence of the FMRP-R138Q mutant associated with intellectual disability and seizures, reinforcing the hypothesis of a direct link between BK channel dysregulation and FXS.
Materials and methods
Cell culture, transfection, cDNA constructs, and mutagenesis
HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS plus 1% penicillin/streptomycin and kept in a humidified incubator at 37°C, 5% CO2. Cells were plated on 8-well glass-bottom micro-slides (Ibidi) for STORM experiments and on 12-mm polylysine-treated glass coverslips for electrophysiology experiments. Transfections were performed 24 h later with jetPrime reagent (Polyplus). The constructs used in this study were mammalian expression plasmids containing the human BKα (GenBank accession no. U11058), rabbit BKβ4 (GenBank accession no. XM_002711330), and human FMRP (GenBank accession no. XM_002711330). Rabbit BKβ4 shows 99% homology with the human BKβ4 and has been shown to produce identical biophysical effects to the human homologue when coexpressed with BKα channels (Large et al., 2015). The R138Q mutation was introduced in the FMRP construct using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Genomics) and confirmed by sequencing.
Antibodies and immunostaining
Primary antibodies were mouse anti-BKα (ab192759; Abcam), rabbit anti-BKβ4 (ab222083; Abcam), and rat anti-HA (11867423001; Roche Applied Science). Secondary antibodies were goat anti-rat conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (ab150159; Abcam), goat anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (A21245) or Alexa Fluor 488 (A11008), and goat anti-mouse conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (A32728) or Alexa Fluor 488 (A11001), all from Invitrogen. Cells at a density of 4 × 105 per well were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, EM grade) in PBS for 10 min at room temperature and then reduced with 0.1% NaBH4 in PBS for 7 min to mitigate cell auto-fluorescence. Next, cells were washed three times with PBS (5 min per wash) and then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min. Subsequently, cells were blocked for 90 min with 10% normal goat serum and 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS and incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h. Samples were washed five times with 1% normal goat serum and 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS (10 min per wash), incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h, and washed again. Cells were then fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde for 10 min, rinsed three times with PBS, and stored at 4°C until used.
STORM imaging was performed on a Nikon N-STORM super-resolution system with a Nikon Eclipse Ti inverted microscope equipped with an HP Apo TIRF 100× oil NA 1.49 objective (Nikon), a Perfect Focus System (Nikon), and an ORCA-Flash4.0 V2 Digital CMOS camera C11440 (Hamamatsu). Fluorescence emission was filtered with a 405/488/561/640-nm Laser Quad Band filter cube (TRF89901; Chroma). STORM imaging buffer contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 10 mM NaCl, 10% (wt/vol) glucose, 100 mM β-mercaptoethylamine, 0.56 mg/ml glucose oxidase, and 34 µg/ml catalase (all reagents from Sigma-Aldrich). Reconstructed images were generated from 5 × 104 acquired frames (2.5 × 104 per channel) using NIS-Elements software (Nikon). We performed at least three independent transfection experiments for each protein combination shown in this study. For every experiment, we determined the location of hundreds of thousands of molecules. Lateral localization accuracy was estimated, as described elsewhere (Shintani et al., 2005), as 13 ± 4 nm for Alexa Fluor 647 and 16 ± 6 nm for Alexa Fluor 488. Reconstructed images were filtered to remove background. Quantitative analysis of STORM images was performed using nearest-neighbor distance (NND) and cluster analysis using in-house script based on the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) algorithm, similar to previously published work (Zhang et al., 2016; Fig. S1 and Supplemental text, see bottom of PDF). Comparable results were obtained by analyzing our data with a customized script using a distance-based clustering algorithm (Ricci et al., 2015; Zanacchi et al., 2017) kindly provided by Dr. Carlo Manzo (The Institute of Photonic Sciences, University of Vic, Barcelona, Spain). Density filtering of 60-nm radius with a count of 10 molecules was found to fit best the clustering properties of the samples. Clusters were classified in three categories: “only red fluorophores,” “only green fluorophores” (we refer to these two types as “homoclusters,” formed by just one fluorophore), and “red and green fluorophores” (referred to as “heteroclusters,” composed by more than one fluorophore). Cluster distributions are represented as plots of the percentage of each cluster type normalized to all clusters (all fluorophores).
Electrophysiological recordings were performed 24–48 h after transfection. Recordings were done using the patch-clamp inside-out configuration (Hamill et al., 1981) at room temperature (22–24°C), using an Axopatch-200B amplifier and Digidata 1550A plus HumSilencer system. Patch pipettes were fabricated from thick-wall borosilicate glass (1.5-mm OD × 0.86-mm inside diameter) using the Sutter P-97 puller and fire polished. The obtained pipettes had a resistance of 2–5 mΩ when filled with inside-out patch recording solutions, which contained (in mM) 80 KMeSO3, 60 N-methylglucamine-MeSO3, 20 HEPES, 2 KCl, and 2 MgCl2 (pH 7.4). The bath solution contained (in mM) 80 KMeSO3, 60 N-methylglucamine-MeSO3, 20 HEPES, 2 KCl, 1 hydroxyethyl ethylenediamine triacetic acid, and CaCl2 to give the desired free Ca2+ concentration. For whole cell recordings, the bath solution contained (in mM) 144 NaCl, 5.8 KCl, 0.9 MgCl2, 2.1 CaCl2, 0.1 NaH2PO4, 5.6 glucose, and 10 HEPES. The pipette solution contained (in mM) 135 KCl, 3.5 MgCl2, 2 Na2 ATP, 5 EGTA, and 5 HEPES, with pH adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. To isolate the calcium currents, 135 CsCl2 was used instead of KCl in the pipette solution and pH was adjusted to 7.4 with CsOH. The total amount of CaCl2 needed to obtain the desired Ca2+ concentration was calculated using the Max Chelator program. Ca2+ concentrations were confirmed using a Ca2+-sensitive electrode (Orion electrode; Thermo Laboratory Systems). Clampex and Clampfit software (pClamp10; Axon Instruments) were used for stimulus generation and data acquisition. Data were acquired at 100 kHz and low-pass filtered at 5 kHz with a four-pole Bessel filter.
Online supplemental material
Supplemental text appears at the bottom of the PDF and includes additional details about the quantitative analysis of the STORM data presented in the manuscript. Fig. S1 includes details about STORM analysis control. Table S1 lists the Boltzmann fit parameters of the G-V curves shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 5, and Fig. 7.
FMRP associates with and modifies the gating characteristics of BKα channels
We investigated the effects of FMRP on pore-forming BKα channels in excised inside-out membrane patches from HEK cells coexpressing both proteins over a range of Ca2+ concentrations in the absence of any BK regulatory subunits. FMRP clearly altered activation and deactivation kinetics of BKα channels. For instance, at +100 mV, τact (activation time constant) increased twofold (from 3.1 ± 0.3 ms to 6.3 ± 0.5 ms; P < 0.01) and τdeact (deactivation time constant) eightfold (from 0.3 ± 0.1 ms to 2.6 ± 0.2 ms; P < 0.001; Fig. 1 A). This effect was accompanied by a slight negative shift of V1/2 values at all Ca2+ concentrations (Fig. 1, B and C; and Table S1; P < 0.01 in 0 µM Ca2+). Using direct STORM (dSTORM) microscopy combined with TIRF, we examined the spatial distribution of FMRP and BKα channels (Fig. 1 D) at or near the plasma membrane. NND analysis revealed a bell-shaped distribution with a clear peak around 20–25 nm (Fig. 1 E), supporting the idea that BKα subunits and FMRP are in nanoscale proximity. Cluster analysis showed the presence of multi-protein complexes containing both BKα and FMRP at higher proportion than clusters composed exclusively by BKα or by FMRP (Fig. 1 F). This is in agreement with previous results showing coimmunoprecipitation of FMRP with BKα (Myrick et al., 2015). To discard the possibility of nonspecific assembly due to overexpression, we performed a control experiment using the δ subunit of the epithelial sodium channel (δENaC), which should not functionally (or physically) interact with BKα channels. Coexpression of BKα and δENaC yielded higher frequency of isolated green or red fluorescent signals that appeared to be at higher distances one from the other (Fig. 1 D). Consistent with this observation, image analysis revealed a broader NND distribution around lower peak values (Fig. 1 E) and a lower percentage of heteroclusters (Fig. 1 G).
Interestingly, the FMRP effect on the activation rate was observed not only in full BKα channels but also in BKα core constructs where the Ca2+ sensor domain (gating ring) had been completely removed (Budelli et al., 2013; Fig. 2; τact increased from 1.1 ± 0.2 ms to 6.4 ± 0.8 ms; P < 0.001). To test if the observed effect was accompanied by alteration in BKα surface expression levels, as has been proposed for CaV2.2 ion channels (Ferron et al., 2014), we compared the impact of FMRP coexpression on BKα current density levels with those of CaV2.2. Our results reproduced the 70% reduction of CaV2.2 current levels observed by Ferron et al. (2014), whereas the differences in BKα current density were significantly smaller (Fig. 3). This result suggests that FMRP directly regulates BKα channel activity, similar to what has been proposed with Slack ion channels (Brown et al., 2010).
All together, these results suggest that the observed effects of FMRP on the steady-state properties of BKα channels are due to direct interaction of these proteins and that FMRP actions may not be restricted to BK channels containing BKβ4 subunits.
Effects of FMRP on BKα gating
We aimed to identify the gating transitions associated with the observed kinetic changes induced by FMRP by using the allosteric modeling framework for BKα channels (Fig.4, inset, Scheme 1; Horrigan and Aldrich, 2002). Two observations prompted us to study the influence of FMRP on the parameters linked to the pore opening (L and ZL) and voltage sensors (J, ZJ, and D) but not on the Ca2+ dependent parameters (C, E, and K). First, in spite of the clear effects on channel kinetics, the presence of FMRP did not dramatically affect Ca2+ sensitivity (Fig. 1 C). Second, the regulatory effects were still observed in BKα core channels (Fig. 2). Thus, we simplified the HA model into Subscheme 1 (Fig. 4, inset) and performed all the experiments in the virtual absence of Ca2+.
The changes in the voltage dependence of C-O (ZL) can be estimated by measuring the kinetics of the ionic K+ currents (τ) at extreme voltages (Fig. 4 A). We did not observe differences in ZL in the presence or absence of FMRP (Fig. 4 B), suggesting that the partial charges for channel opening (zN and zP) are not altered by FMRP. Subsequently, we obtained the PO-V relationships over a wide range of voltages and determined the values of the gating parameters according to the HA model (Horrigan and Aldrich, 2002). These data with their corresponding fits are presented in Fig. 4, C and D and summarized in Table 1. The FMRP-induced negative shifts in the PO-V relationships can be explained by a twofold increase in L0 and a 3.5-fold increase in voltage sensor activation (J0). The increase in L0 related to intrinsic gating (i.e., independent of Ca2+ or voltage sensor activation) is consistent with the single-channel data from BKα+FMRP–excised membrane patches showing an increased PO at very negative voltage values compared with patches containing only BKα channels (Fig. 4 C). Alterations of the gating charge parameter ZJ or the allosteric constant D were not compatible with the data (Table 1). FMRP induced a negative shift in the VHC (approximately −50 mV) of BKα channels, in agreement with the idea that it shifts the voltage-sensor equilibrium toward negative potentials (Table 1). These results are consistent with the Qa-V plots shown in Fig. 4 E, which were calculated from the logarithmic slope of the PO-V data and fitted with Eq. 7 (Table 2). Therefore, our results suggest that in the absence of β4 subunits, FMRP interacts with BKα channels, favoring activation by simultaneously decreasing the energy needed for channel opening and shifting the activation of voltage sensors toward more negative voltages.
FMRP associates with BKαβ4 channels and only modestly alters their biophysical properties
We next evaluated the effect of FMRP on BKαβ4 channels using the same experimental setup. In agreement with previous studies (Behrens et al., 2000; Brenner et al., 2000; Orio et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2006), coexpression of BKβ4 with BKα subunits slowed down channel deactivation (Fig. 5 A) and shifted the V1/2 toward negative values at Ca2+ concentrations >10 µM (Fig. 5, B and C). Contrary to what was expected, coexpression of FMRP with BKαβ4 channels did not result in dramatic functional differences. We did observe moderate effects in the voltage dependence of activation, which was shifted to more negative values compared with BKαβ4 channels (Fig. 5, B and C; P < 0.05 in 0 µM and 1 µM Ca2+). Additionally, FMRP slowed down (about twofold) the BKαβ4 gating kinetics at potentials below +80 mV (Fig. 5 D). The τ-V relationships reflected the decrease in activation and deactivation rates in BKαβ4 channels versus BKα channels (Fig. 5 D). However, coexpression with FMRP revealed no further effects other than the above-mentioned slight increase in the deactivation time constants. The fold change in the time constant was quantitatively similar in 0 µM and 1 µM Ca2+. Specifically, coexpression with FMRP increased the τdeact of BKαβ4 channels (at +100 mV, 0 µM Ca2+) from 1.0 ± 0.1 ms to 1.6 ± 0.1 ms (∼1.6-fold increase, absence versus presence of FMRP). Similarly, in 1 µM Ca2+, the observed change of τdeact was from 2.7 ± 0.2 ms to 5.2 ± 0.2 ms (∼1.9 fold). The PO-V relationships in the presence of FMRP showed an increase in open probability (Fig. 5 E) and a shift toward negative voltages, although the change was moderate compared with the effect on BKα alone (Fig. 5 F). Fits to the HA allosteric model revealed a ninefold change in the intrinsic gating parameter L0 (BKαβ4 9.8 × 10−7; BKαβ4+FMRP 8.6 × 10−6; Table 1) without significant changes in J0 (BKαβ4 0.12; BKαβ4+FMRP 0.15; Table 1). Consistent with these findings, FMRP failed to shift the Qa-V relationships of BKαβ4 channels more negatively than that of BKα alone (ΔVHC approximately −15 mV, Table 2; compare Fig. 5 G with Fig. 4 E). These results indicate that the effects of FMRP on BKαβ4 channels are more complex than initially envisioned. In any case, the presence of FMRP seems not to abrogate the regulation of BKα by BKβ4 subunits, but rather to slightly potentiate it.
Is this functional effect due to association of FMRP with BKαβ4 channels? We addressed this question using super-resolution microscopy to study the spatial organization of BKα channels, BKβ4 subunits, and FMRP. Our experimental approach only allows us to perform dual labeling (see Materials and methods). Therefore, we imaged all possible combinations of labeled pairs to puzzle out the contribution of complexes containing different combinations of the three proteins. Close localizations of BKα-FMRP, BKβ4-FMRP, and BKα-BKβ4 were observed (Fig. 6 A). This is reflected in the NND distribution analysis, showing a higher peak at 25–30 nm for all the combinations (Fig. 6 B). Our results show a similar fraction of BKα-FMRP associations in the presence of BKβ4 (compare Fig. 1 F and Fig. 6 C). More importantly, the NND distribution and the relative fraction of BKα-BKβ4 complexes remained unaltered in the presence of FMRP (compare Fig. 6 B with Fig. 8 B, and Fig. 6 D with Fig. 8 C). Many uncertainties, including the lack of an accurate description of the physiological BKα:BKβ4 stoichiometries (Gonzalez-Perez and Lingle, 2019), prevent us from elaborating a quantitative model of interaction. All the same, this finding suggests that when BKα is expressed with BKβ4 and FMRP, all three proteins are located together with high probability. This argues against the possibility that FMRP and BKβ4 interact with BKα in a mutually exclusive way.
The disease-related FMRP-R138Q mutant shows no functional effects on BK channels
The missense mutation R138Q in the FMR1 gene associates with intellectual disability and seizures (Myrick et al., 2015). This mutation results in a partial loss-of-function of FMRP, which maintains its ability to regulate translation but lacks presynaptic effects. Myrick et al. (2015) hypothesized that the resulting FMRP(R138Q) protein resulted in impaired interactions with BK channels in mice central neurons. In this study, we examined the functional effects of the mutant FMRP(R138Q) on BKα and BKαβ4 channels. Our prediction was that this nonfunctional FMRP mutant would not exert any of the previously observed effects on the channel kinetics, which would also be reflected in lower levels of protein associations. Fig. 7 A shows the effect of FMRP(R138Q) on BKα channels. The mutant did not modify BKα gating characteristics (at +100 mV, τact = 3.1 ± 0.3 ms for BKα channels versus 3.7 ± 0.5 ms for BKα+FMRP(R138Q) channels; P = 0.40). Similarly, FMRP(R138Q) also failed to alter the steady-state parameters when coexpressed with BKαβ4 channels (Fig. 7 B). These results are in agreement with previous results (Myrick et al., 2015) suggesting that the FMRP(R138Q) construct shows impaired interaction with BK channels in heterologous systems.
Using STORM, we examined how coexpression of FMRP(R138Q) affected the spatial distribution of BKα or BKα-BKβ4 protein complexes. Similar to wild-type FMRP, FMRP(R138Q) localized at nanoscale distances from BKα (Fig. 7 C, left panels) in the absence of BKβ4. This was reflected in the NND analysis distribution, showing a peak around 20 nm (Fig. 7 D). The cluster analysis indicated the presence of complexes formed by BKα and FMRP(R138Q), which seemed to occur at higher levels than BKα-only channels but less frequently than protein complexes containing exclusively FMRP(R138Q) (Fig. 7 E). BKα and BKβ4 in the presence of FMRP(R138Q) also exhibited close localizations with around 50% of the NND distances within the 0–50 nm range (Fig. 7 D). Cluster analysis of the STORM data from cells expressing BKα-BKβ4-FMRP(R138Q) showed a lower incidence of multimeric clusters containing BKα+BKβ4 compared with coexpression of BKα+BKβ4 with wild-type FMRP (compare yellow bars in Fig. 7 F with Fig. 6 D). Previously published observations suggested that the R138Q mutation in FMRP altered its association with BKβ4 (Myrick et al., 2015). Consistent with this notion, super-resolution data in cells expressing BKα-BKβ4-FMRP(R138Q) showed a broader distribution of lower BKβ4-FMRP(R138Q) NND values (Fig. 8 B) and a reduced fraction of BKβ4-FMRP(R138Q) complexes (Fig. 8 D).
In spite of the recent advances in uncovering the novel roles of FMRP in ion channel modulation (Brown et al., 2010; Deng et al., 2013; Ferron et al., 2014), important questions remain about the underlying molecular mechanisms. FMRP is a ubiquitous protein with a growing number of proposed functions (Ferron, 2016). BK channels can be expressed in a large variety of cells and tissues, with or without regulatory subunits from the BKβ and BKγ families (Latorre et al., 2017). In this study, we have tested the effects of FMRP on BK channels containing different subunit combinations of physiological relevance in neurons using a heterologous expression system. Using electrophysiological measurements, we have addressed the effects of FMRP on BK channel biophysical properties. These functional data have been correlated with the relative localization of the proteins using super-resolution microscopy.
One of our most relevant findings reveals that in the absence of regulatory subunits, FMRP has a clear effect on BKα channel kinetics, mostly consisting of an eightfold increase in the current deactivation time constants. The PO-V relationship is shifted toward more negative values, which can be explained in the context of the BK allosteric model (Horrigan and Aldrich, 2002) by decreasing the energetic barrier for the C-O transition (twofold increase in constant L0) and/or shifting the activation of the voltage sensors toward more negative voltages (3.5-fold increase in J0). The first explanation is consistent with the observation that in the presence of FMRP, higher PO of BKα channels is observed at very negative voltages (when both the Ca2+ and voltage sensor are not activated). The latter explanation is supported by the hyperpolarization shift (−50 mV) noted in the Qa-V relationship in the presence of FMRP. This finding requires further confirmation by gating current recordings to assess directly the impact of FMRP on the voltage sensor function.
Several lines of evidence indicate that this regulatory effect occurs via close interaction of both proteins. First, the FMRP effects are observed in isolated inside-out patches. Second, STORM data show close localization of both proteins in the nanoscale range (NND distribution peak around 20 nm) and high occurrence of BKα+FMRP protein clusters. The interaction may possibly occur at the transmembrane region or the S6/RCK1 linker, since part of the regulatory effects of FMRP on the channel are preserved in BKα channels where the intracellular Ca2+ sensor has been completely truncated. Finally, we provide further evidence showing that coexpression of FMRP with BKα does not have a strong impact on current density levels, as opposed to the FMRP-regulated CaV2.2 channel membrane abundance via proteasome-mediated degradation (Ferron et al., 2014). Altogether, our results are in agreement with the proposed translation-independent regulatory mechanisms of Slo2.2 and BKαβ4 channels by FMRP (Brown et al., 2010; Deng et al., 2013).
We compared the effects of FMRP on BKα channels with those on BKαβ4 channels. The complex effects of the BKβ4 subunit on BKα gating were previously explained in the context of the HA allosteric model by a decrease in the L0 constant (closed-to-open transition) and a decrease in VHC (favoring voltage sensor activation; Wang et al., 2006). An alternative model has been proposed where the effects of the BKβ4 subunits are explained by the stabilization of the voltage sensor in the active conformation and a reduction in the number of gating charges per sensor (Contreras et al., 2012). Our experiments qualitatively reproduced these effects. Coexpression of BKα with BKβ4 caused a decrease in the L0 constant, a negative shift in VHO (half-maximal activation of the voltage sensors when the channels are in the open state), and an increase in J0 values. According to the hypothesis proposed by Deng et al. (2013), we were expecting that in the presence of FMRP the effect of the BKβ4 subunits would be abrogated. However, this was not the case. Rather than reversing the BKβ4 effects, FMRP seemed to slightly potentiate them. The shift in the PO-V curve toward more negative voltages was consistent with higher τ values at negative voltages. In the context of the HA allosteric model, this effect could be explained by increased intrinsic gating (ninefold increase in L0), while other parameters remained very similar to BKαβ4 channels. STORM experiments showed a high incidence of heteroclusters containing the three proteins, confirming the association of FMRP to complexes containing BKα and BKβ4 subunits. Altogether, these data support the previously proposed hypothesis that FMRP binds to BKαβ4 channels in CA3 neurons, regulating their function by increasing PO (Deng et al., 2013; Deng and Klyachko, 2016). Further work is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying homo- and heterocluster formation, as well as the possible participation of other proteins in these complexes.
All the observed effects of FMRP on BKα and BKαβ4 channels were greatly reduced by introducing the R138Q mutation in the FMRP protein. This missense mutation was described to disrupt the regulatory role of FMRP in AP duration, presumably by perturbation of its ability to interact with BK channels, while not altering other canonical roles involving RNA binding and regulation of translation (Myrick et al., 2015). One possible explanation for the lack of regulatory effects by FMRP(R138Q) in our experiments could be that this mutation is associated with reduced expression levels. However, this possibility is ruled out by the results in the STORM experiments showing similar expression levels of FMRP(R138Q) than wild-type FMRP. Instead, the observed lack of regulatory effects of the FMRP(R138Q) mutant on BKαβ4 channels seem to be due at least partly to weaker interactions of FMRP(R138Q) with BKβ4. These results are in agreement with previous data showing impaired (but not fully abolished) FMRP(R138Q)-BKβ4 interactions (Myrick et al., 2015).
A possible explanation for the findings of our study is summarized in the cartoon depicted in Fig. 9. Our data show that FMRP locates closely to BKα subunits and modulates their function, resulting in increased channel PO at physiological voltage values (Fig. 9 A). In the presence of BKβ4 subunits, FMRP associates with complexes containing both BKα and BKβ4 subunits to regulate their function, slightly potentiating the effects of BKβ4 regulation (Fig. 9 B). The biophysical properties of BKαβ4 channels in the presence of FMRP are not equivalent to BKα-only channels, implying the existence of a more complex mechanism other than the sequestration of BKβ4 subunits, as previously described (Deng et al., 2013). It is important to note that our model cannot rule out the participation of other proteins in the functional complexes. The most relevant conclusion of our data is that, depending on the physiological context, FMRP may regulate BK currents via modulation of BKα and/or BKαβ4 channels.
In central neurons, contribution of type II BK channels (formed by BKαβ4 complexes) to electrical activity depends on the local intracellular Ca2+ concentrations. At low Ca2+ concentrations (i.e., <10 µM Ca2+), it has been proposed that the slow gating of type II BK would preclude these channels from contributing to membrane repolarization, resulting in broader APs (Brenner et al., 2005; Jaffe et al., 2011). In this case, a reduction of firing rate is observed due to activation of small conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (SK) channels (Brenner et al., 2005). On the other hand, at high Ca2+ concentrations (>10 µM Ca2+), activation of β4-containing type II BK channels leads to significantly prolonged tail currents, enhancing the medium afterhyperpolarization. Larger afterhyperpolarizations result in increased interspike intervals, decreasing firing rates (Jaffe et al., 2011). Overall, the physiological outcome of BKβ4 subunits’ incorporation to BK channels would be a reduction of neuronal excitability, which may protect neurons against seizures. In CA3 neurons, it has been proposed that the mechanism underlying FMRP regulation of BK currents relies mainly on the direct interaction of FMRP with the regulatory BKβ4 subunits, resulting in increased Ca2+-dependent BK channel activation (Deng et al., 2013). It must be noted that despite the prominent expression of β4 subunits in some brain regions such as the CA3 region of the hippocampus, a number of studies reported that some BK currents are still sensitive to iberiotoxin block, suggesting that not all BK channels contain BKβ4 subunits (Raffaelli et al., 2004; Shruti et al., 2012; Deng et al., 2013). Interestingly, based on the biophysical and pharmacological properties of BK channel currents from CA3 neurons, Shruti et al. (2012) proposed that the main function of the BKβ4 subunit is the control of BKα trafficking to the membrane. Within this physiological context, our finding that FMRP can regulate BK channels formed by BKα subunits may be of important relevance. The data that we present now suggest that in some physiological contexts FMRP may also exert similar regulatory effects by interacting with iberiotoxin-sensitive BKα-only channels. In fact, this result is consistent with previously published data showing that the FMRP effect on CA3 neuronal excitability is iberiotoxin-sensitive (Deng et al., 2013), as well as with further evidence proving interaction of BKα and FMRP in a pull-down protein assay (Myrick et al., 2015). One speculation is that the slow gating induced by FMRP would reduce the contribution of BKα channels (type I) to the AP repolarization or contribute to sustained interspike conductance. Similar to the effects on type II BK channels, the observed effects of FMRP on BKα channels are consistent with a functional effect of AP broadening, indirectly enhancing the Ca2+ influx and thereby increasing neurotransmitter release. However, the role of other conductances, including SK channels (Deng et al., 2019), must also be taken into account to fully understand the in vivo physiological framework depicting the regulation of electrical activity by FMRP.
Merritt C. Maduke served as editor.
We thank Prof. Mark Hollywood (Dundalk Institute of Technology, Dundalk, Ireland) for providing the BKβ4 construct and for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank David Bartolomé Martín for technical help with the representation of STORM data and Dr. Carlo Manzo for assessment of the scripts development and validation.
This work was funded by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (grant 648936, to T. Giraldez) and Dirección de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (FONDECYT 1130904 to P. Rojas).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Author contributions: A. Kshatri performed conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing, and visualization. A. Cerrada performed investigation, formal analysis, and writing-original draft. R. Gimeno provided software and formal analysis. D. Bartolomé-Martín performed formal analysis, writing-review and editing, and validation. P. Rojas performed formal analysis and writing-review and editing. T. Giraldez provided conceptualization, formal analysis, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision, visualization, project administration, and validation.
This work is part of the special collection entitled "Electrical Signaling in the Heart and Nervous System: A Joint Meeting of the Society of General Physiologists and Latin American Society of Biophysicists."