Volume 137, No. 6, June 6, 2011. Pages 479–488.
Please note that Yu et al. (2010. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 132:10847–10856) cited the wrong LJ parameter set used for Na+ and K+ ions (Andersen, O.S., and B. Roux, personal communication). In their study, Yu et al. (2010) did not use the parameter set from Beglov and Roux (1994. J. Chem. Phys. 100:9050–9063), but instead the parameter set from Noskov and Roux (2008. J. Mol. Biol. 377:804–818). These two parameter sets yield different K+→Na+ hydration free energy differences. While the parameters from Beglov and Roux (1994) yield a value of −20.7 kcal/mol, the parameters from Noskov and Roux (2008) yield a value of −18.6 kcal/mol. This consequently modifies two entries in Table I (marked by asterisks below), but has no impact on the published conclusions.
K+/Na+ selectivity by experiment and calculation
| Method | Solvent | ΔΔG (kcal/mol) | Selective for |
| Experiment | Formamidea | −0.9 | Na+ |
| Formamidebc | −0.7 | Na+ | |
| NMAbd | −1.1 | Na+ | |
| Pairwise Additive | Formamidec | 0.9 | K+ |
| (CHARMM27) | |||
| Formamidec | 1.3 | K+ | |
| (OPLS-AA) | |||
| NMAe | 1.6 | K+ | |
| (CHARMM22/NBFIX) | |||
| NMAdg | 0.7* | K+ | |
| (CHARMM27) | |||
| NMAdg | 2.6* | K+ | |
| (CHAEMM27/NBFIX) | |||
| Polarizable | Formamidec | −1.3 | Na+ |
| (AMOEBA) | |||
| Formamidef | −2.2 | Na+ | |
| (QM/MM) | |||
| NMAd | −0.3 | Na+ | |
| (Drude) |
| Method | Solvent | ΔΔG (kcal/mol) | Selective for |
| Experiment | Formamidea | −0.9 | Na+ |
| Formamidebc | −0.7 | Na+ | |
| NMAbd | −1.1 | Na+ | |
| Pairwise Additive | Formamidec | 0.9 | K+ |
| (CHARMM27) | |||
| Formamidec | 1.3 | K+ | |
| (OPLS-AA) | |||
| NMAe | 1.6 | K+ | |
| (CHARMM22/NBFIX) | |||
| NMAdg | 0.7* | K+ | |
| (CHARMM27) | |||
| NMAdg | 2.6* | K+ | |
| (CHAEMM27/NBFIX) | |||
| Polarizable | Formamidec | −1.3 | Na+ |
| (AMOEBA) | |||
| Formamidef | −2.2 | Na+ | |
| (QM/MM) | |||
| NMAd | −0.3 | Na+ | |
| (Drude) |
K+/Na+ selectivity of bulk liquid formamide and NMA as determined by experimental work, pairwise-additive (nonpolarizable) force field calculation, polarizable force field (AMOEBA and Drude) calculations, and QM/MM (hybrid quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical) calculations. Note that the pairwise-additive force field calculations display positive (K+) selectivity, whereas all other determinations display negative (Na+) selectivity.
Marcus, 1983.
Cox and Parker, 1973, and Schmid et.al., 2000.
Grossfield et al., 2003.
Yu et al., 2010a
Noskov et al., 2004.
Varma and Rempe, 2008.
Noskov and Roux, 2008.
