We have measured the sensitivity of rod photoreceptors from overnight-dark–adapted Xenopus laevis through developmental stages 46–66 into adulthood by using suction-pipette recording. The dark current increased gradually from ∼5 pA at stage 46 to ∼20 pA at stage 57, compared with an adult (metamorphosed) current of ∼35 pA. This increase in dark current largely paralleled the progressive increase in length and diameter of the rod outer segment (ROS). Throughout stages 46–66, the dark current increased approximately linearly with ROS surface area. At stage 53, there was a steep (∼10-fold) increase in the rod flash sensitivity, accompanied by a steep increase in the time-to-peak of the half-saturated flash response. This covariance of sensitivity and time-to-peak suggested a change in the state of adaptation of rods at stage 53 and thereafter. When the isolated retina was preincubated with 11-cis-retinal, the flash sensitivity and the response time-to-peak of rods before stage 53 became similar to those at or after stage 53, suggesting that the presence of free opsin (i.e., visual pigment without chromophore) in rods before stage 53 was responsible for the adapted state (low sensitivity and short time-to-peak). By comparing the response sensitivity before stage 53 to the sensitivity at/after stage 53 measured from rods that had been subjected to various known bleaches, we estimated that 22–28% of rod opsin in stage 50–52 tadpoles (i.e., before stage 53) was devoid of chromophore despite overnight dark-adaptation. When continuously dark adapted for 7 d or longer, however, even tadpoles before stage 53 yielded rods with similar flash sensitivity and response time-to-peak as those of later-stage animals. In conclusion, it appears that chromophore regeneration is very slow in tadpoles before stage 53, but this regeneration becomes much more efficient at stage 53. A similar delay in the maturity of chromophore regeneration may partially underlie the low sensitivity of rods observed in newborn mammals, including human infants.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 2002
Article Contents
Article|
November 25 2002
Rod Sensitivity During Xenopus Development
Wei-Hong Xiong,
Wei-Hong Xiong
1Departments of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
Search for other works by this author on:
King-Wai Yau
King-Wai Yau
1Departments of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
2Departments of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
3Departments of Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
Search for other works by this author on:
Wei-Hong Xiong
1Departments of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
King-Wai Yau
1Departments of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
2Departments of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
3Departments of Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
Address correspondence to Dr. King-Wai Yau, Room 907, Preclinical Teaching Building, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205. Fax: (410) 614-3579; E-mail: [email protected]
*
Abbreviation used in this paper: ERG, electroretinogram.
Received:
August 21 2002
Revision Received:
October 21 2002
Accepted:
October 22 2002
Online ISSN: 1540-7748
Print ISSN: 0022-1295
The Rockefeller University Press
2002
J Gen Physiol (2002) 120 (6): 817–827.
Article history
Received:
August 21 2002
Revision Received:
October 21 2002
Accepted:
October 22 2002
Citation
Wei-Hong Xiong, King-Wai Yau; Rod Sensitivity During Xenopus Development . J Gen Physiol 1 December 2002; 120 (6): 817–827. doi: https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.20028702
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Gating by Cyclic Gmp and Voltage in the α Subunit of the Cyclic Gmp–Gated Channel from Rod Photoreceptors
J Gen Physiol (September,1999)
Molecular Analysis of Potential Hinge Residues in the Inactivation Gate of Brain Type IIA Na+ Channels
J Gen Physiol (May,1997)
The Rate of Information Transfer of Naturalistic Stimulation by Graded Potentials
J Gen Physiol (July,2003)
Email alerts
Advertisement