The proposal of adaptation in individual ryanodine receptor (RyR)/Ca2+ release channels (Györke and Fill 1993) has been an exciting concept that has stimulated widespread consideration of the properties and mechanisms involved in the activation and termination of Ca2+ release in muscle and other cells. Here, we consider what adaptation of individual RyRs is defined to mean and examine the evidence for its existence in the light of the recent reappraisal of the stimulus used in the original experiments. We further discuss the findings of other single-channel studies, as well as in vivo studies on Ca2+ release designed to test a possible role of adaptation, and conclude that there are inconsistencies in the adaptation model of RyR regulation. In an attempt to resolve the issue, and to obtain insights into the fascinating dynamic responses of...
Questions about Adaptation in Ryanodine Receptors
“Inactivation” and “desensitization” are names traditionally used to describe refractory behavior in voltage- and ligand-gated channels, respectively. Laver and Lamb 1998 found that two RyR phenomena arise out of one inactivation mechanism: (1) the channel becomes refractory to the continued presence of a stimulatory ligand (i.e., desensitization); and (2) the channel activity declines after a voltage-step (inactivation). Thus, both terms (“desensitization” and “inactivation”) could be used to describe the one mechanism depending on how it is observed (ligand-step or voltage-step). Although RyRs are gated by both voltage and by ligands, “inactivation” has generally been adopted as the term to describe refractory closing of RyRs. Inactivation appears as long closed periods that separate spontaneous bursts of activity. During a closed period, the RyR cannot be activated by raising the ligand concentration but can be reactivated immediately by changing the voltage (see Figure 10 in Laver and Lamb 1998).
G.D. Lamb, D.R. Laver, D.G. Stephenson; Questions about Adaptation in Ryanodine Receptors. J Gen Physiol 1 December 2000; 116 (6): 883–890. doi: https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.116.6.883
Download citation file:
Sign in
Client Account
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Email alerts
Advertisement