A striking feature of the T cell receptor (TCR) β chain structure is the large FG loop that protrudes freely into the solvent on the external face of the Cβ domain. We have already shown that a transgene-encoded Vβ8.2+ TCR β chain lacking the complete Cβ FG loop supports normal development and function of conventional α/β T cells. Thus, the FG loop is not absolutely necessary for TCR signaling. However, further analysis has revealed that a small population of α/β T cells coexpressing NK1.1 are severely depleted in these transgenic mice. The few remaining NK1.1 T cells have a normal phenotype but express very low levels of TCR. We find that the TCR Vβ8.2+ chain lacking the Cβ FG loop cannot pair efficiently with the invariant Vα14-Jα281 TCR α chain commonly expressed by this T cell family. Consequently, fewer NK1.1 T cells develop in these mice. Our results suggest that expression of the Vα14+ TCR α chain is particularly sensitive to TCR-β conformation. Development of NK1.1 T cells appears to need a TCR-β conformation dependent on the presence of the Cβ loop that is not necessarily required for assembly and function of TCRs on most α/β T cells.
All crystal structures of the TCR β chain reported to date have shown that the constant and variable domains are closely associated, with a large, solvent-exposed loop of 14 amino acids protruding on the external face of the Cβ domain 1,2,3,4. The location and size of this loop (almost half of an Ig domain) suggested that it could be the crucial link between TCR-α/β recognition of antigen and transmission of signals by the invariant CD3 1,4,5. To study its function, we recently generated mice transgenic for a TCR β chain lacking the complete Cβ FG loop. The TCR β chain (Vβ8.2-Jβ2.1) chosen for mutagenesis has been crystallized 1; it was cloned from T cell hybridoma 14.3.d, which expresses a TCR α chain (Vα4-Jα47) and recognizes a PR8 influenza hemagglutinin peptide, HA 110–119, presented by the I-Ed MHC molecule 6. Surprisingly, we found that development and function of conventional α/β T cells was normal in mice transgenic for a TCR β chain lacking the Cβ FG loop. Thus, the Cβ FG loop is not absolutely required for transmitting the signal of antigen recognition by the TCR 7.
Further analysis revealed that a small population of α/β T cells coexpressing NK1.1 is drastically diminished in these mice. Many features 8, including development, functional properties, and TCR repertoire, distinguish this latter population from conventional T cells. Development of NK1.1 T cells requires expression of the β2 microglobulin–associated, class Ib–like CD1d1 molecule 9,10, which can restrict their response to lipid ligands such as glycosylphosphatidylinositols or glycosylceramides 11,12. NK1.1 T cells can readily produce large amounts of cytokines upon activation 13, and they have been implicated in tumor rejection 14,15 and may also play a regulatory role in autoimmune manifestations 16,17,18. NK1.1 T cells express a limited Vβ repertoire highly skewed toward Vβ8.2, Vβ7, and Vβ2 8, and in transgenic mice expressing single Vβs such as Vβ3 and Vβ8.1, NK1.1 T cell development is totally abrogated 19. Furthermore, ∼80% of NK1.1 T cells express an invariant TCR α chain (Vα14-Jα281) 20,21 that is required for their development 15.
In this study, we present evidence that the Vβ8.2 TCR β chain lacking the complete Cβ FG loop cannot pair efficiently with the canonical Vα14+ TCR α chain. Consequently, NK1.1 T cell development is severely impaired.
Materials And Methods
Transfection of Cell Lines.
Packaging cell lines GP+E-86 23 were transfected with retroviral vector LXSN expressing the Vβ8.2-Jβ2.1+ TCR-β or β-loop− chain or LXSP expressing the Vα4-Jα47+ or Vα14-Jα281+ TCR α chain cDNA. The TCR α chain (Vα14-Jα281) was cloned from NK1.1 α/β+ T cell hybridoma total RNA provided by R. MacDonald (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Lausanne, Switzerland). After appropriate selection of the packaging cells, the infectious supernatants were used to infect TCR− hybridomas 24 as previously described 25. The TCR-β or β-loop− chain was first introduced into the hybridomas and, after neomycin selection (G418; 1 mg/ml), these cells were superinfected with TCR α chain by culturing them on packaging lines producing LXSP TCR-α Vα4-Jα47 or Vα14-Jα281. The hybridomas were then maintained in IMDM supplemented with 2% FCS, neomycin, and puromycin (10 μg/ml). TCR expression was tested by FACS™ as early as 4 d after selection. Stable transfectants were maintained in G418 and puromycin-containing medium.
TCR Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis.
Hybridomas were lysed at 2 × 107 cells/ml in 1% Triton X-100 (Bio-Rad Labs.), 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris/HCl, and 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, buffer containing complete protease inhibitors (Boehringer Mannheim) for 30 min at 4°C. Lysates cleared of cell debris were immunoprecipitated with purified mAb F23.1 (2 μg/ml) and protein G–Sepharose (Pharmacia). After washing with lysis buffer and PBS, the lyophilized pellets were resuspended in reducing SDS buffer, loaded on a 4–12% Bis-Tris precast gel (Novex), and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane Hybond-C extra (Amersham). Blots were probed in PBS 6% blotting blocker nonfat milk (Bio-Rad Labs.) and 0.2% Tween with purified mAb H58 (anti-Cα), followed by goat anti–hamster horseradish peroxidase–labeled mAb (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc.) or biotinylated F23.1 (anti-Vβ8) mAb followed by streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc.). The proteins were detected with a chemiluminescent detection system (Pierce Chemical Co.).
BALB/c and C56BL/6 mice were purchased from IFFA-Credo. The TCR-β knockout mice have been described 26 and were bred in our specific pathogen–free animal facility with the TCR-β or TCR β-loop− transgenic mice.
Cell Suspension, Flow Cytometry, and Antibodies.
Cell suspensions from thymi were depleted of CD8+ T cells with anti-CD8 31M antibody 27 and complement treatment (Cedarlane Labs.), and liver cells were simply ficolled to eliminate red cells before immunofluorescence stainings, performed as previously described 28. Flow cytometric analyses were performed on a FACSCalibur™ equipped with CELLQuest software (Becton Dickinson). The reagents used were mAbs 145-2C11 (anti-CD3∈), NKR-P1C (anti-NK1.1), H57-597 (anti-Cβ), RM4-5 (anti-CD4), IM7 (anti-CD44, Pgp-1), TM-β1 (anti–IL-2R β chain), MEL-14 (anti-CD62L) (all seven mAbs purchased from PharMingen), biotinylated F23.1 (anti-Vβ8.1,2,3), and second step reagent streptavidin–allophycocyanin (Molecular Probes, Inc.).
Single-Cell Reverse Transcriptase–PCR.
Single NK1.1+CD3+ cells were sorted into polycarbonated 96-well plates (one cell per well in 5 μl of PBS) and immediately frozen on dry ice and stored at −70°C. To prepare cDNA, the plate was heated up to 65°C for 1 min before adding into each well 10 μl of the reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR mix (reverse transcriptase Superscript II; GIBCO BRL) for 1 h at 42°C under standard reaction conditions. After heat inactivation of the enzyme (2 min at 95°C), DNA amplification was carried out as described 29. 75 μl of a PCR mix containing Taq polymerase and the primers necessary for DNA amplification of the Vα14+ TCR α chain (5′ Vα14 CTAAGCACAGCACGCTGCACA [reference 20]; 3′ Cα ATGGATCCTCAACTGGACCACAGCCTCA) and Vβ8.2+ TCR β chain (5′ Vβ8.2 CTTGAGCTCAAGATGGGCTCCAGGCTCTTC; 3′ Jβ2.1 CTGCTCAGCATAACTCCCCCG) were added to the wells for the first round of PCR (30 cycles). An aliquot from this PCR (1 μl) was used for a second round of PCR (35 cycles) to individually reamplify the Vα14+ TCR α chain or Vβ8.2+ TCR β chain using the same specific primers.
Results And Discussion
To avoid any influence of the endogenous β locus on the expression of the mutated β chain, mice transgenic for the Vβ8.2+ TCR β chain lacking the Cβ FG loop (β-loop−) were backcrossed to TCR-β−/− mice 26. T cell development in these mice was compared with that in wild-type Vβ8.2+ TCR β chain transgenic mice, also with a β−/− background. As described in our previous study 7, peripheral T cells from mice transgenic for the TCR β or β-loop− chain express equal levels of the TCR–CD3 complex, and whereas the anti-Vβ8 F23.1 mAb recognizes all T cells, the Cβ-specific H57 mAb does not stain cells expressing the TCR β-loop− chain (Fig. 1; reference 4). It is worth pointing out that in the absence of the Cβ FG loop, the anti-CD3∈ 2C11 mAb stains better, suggesting that the epitope recognized is more accessible, a result that might not be surprising, as one of the CD3∈ chains is physically adjacent to the β chain in the TCR–CD3 complex 5.
We consistently found that TCR β-loop− transgenic mice have significantly fewer NK1.1 α/β+ T cells in the thymus, liver, and spleen (data not shown) in comparison to TCR-β transgenic mice or wild-type littermates (Fig. 2). Thus, a mutation in the Cβ domain can notably alter development of NK1.1 α/β T cells. This result was puzzling, considering that conventional α/β T cells are normal in TCR β-loop− transgenic mice 7. Furthermore, the mutated TCR β chain uses Vβ8.2, a variable region that is usually expressed by >40% of NK1.1 α/β T cells 30. Hence, monoclonal expression of the wild-type Vβ8.2+ TCR β chain allows NK1.1 T cell development comparable to that of nontransgenic littermates. Characteristically, NK1.1 T cells express intermediate levels of TCR 8. Interestingly, in TCR β-loop− transgenic mice, TCR expression on the few remaining NK1.1 T cells is even lower than in control animals; these cells express about four times less TCR than do those in wild-type β-transgenic mice (Fig. 3). Otherwise, NK1.1 T cells in β-loop− transgenic mice express normal levels of CD4 and are CD44+CD62 ligand (L)− and IL-2Rβ+, as expected for this T cell population 8. CD1d, a β2 microglobulin–associated molecule required for NK1.1 T cell development 9,10, is also expressed at normal levels in TCR β-loop− transgenic mice (data not shown).
To determine if development of NK1.1 α/β+ T cells could be rescued by the expression of endogenous β chains, as has been described for other TCR-β transgenic mice 19, we studied NK1.1 T cell frequency in TCR β-loop− transgenic mice on a β+/− background. We have already observed that in these mice, inhibition of β rearrangements via allelic exclusion is not total, and ∼10–20% of peripheral T cells can express endogenous β chains (data not shown). NK1.1 α/β+ T cells expressing endogenous β and β-loop− chains could be distinguished by the Cβ-specific H57 mAb, which cannot stain T cells expressing the mutated β chain (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 4, expression of endogenous β chains can rescue NK1.1 T cell development to a certain extent. NK1.1 Cβ+ cells appear in the livers of TCR β-loop− transgenic mice on a β+/− background. Yet these cells only account for about one-third of the whole NK1.1 T cell population. The NK1.1 Cβ− T cells are still predominant. There are two populations of NK1.1 Vβ8+ cells, which express either intermediate or low TCR levels in TCR β-loop− transgenic mice on a β1/− background. Interestingly, expression of endogenous β chains accounts for most of the NK1.1 T cells expressing intermediate TCR levels. Thus, expression of endogenous β chains did rescue some NK1.1 T cell development and restore TCR expression to intermediate levels. This result strongly suggested that the Cβ FG loop is needed for efficient TCR assembly in NK1.1 T cells.
As most NK1.1 α/β+ T cells express an invariant Vα14-Jα281 TCR α chain 20,21, and the mutant TCR β chain is expressed at normal levels by conventional α/β T cells (Fig. 1) but not by NK1.1 T cells (Fig. 3), we assessed whether the mutant Vβ8.2+ TCR β chain could still pair with the Vα14+ TCR α chain. TCR− hybridomas were transfected with cDNAs coding for either the wild-type TCR β or β-loop− chain together with the Vα14+ TCR α chain or Vα4+ TCR α chain (the original partner of the nonmutated β chain) cDNAs. As shown in Fig. 5 A, the TCR β-loop− chain clearly pairs with and is expressed on the cell surface with the Vα4+ TCR α chain but is barely detectable on the cell surface with the Vα14+ TCR α chain. In contrast, the wild-type TCR β chain is expressed on the cell surface with both α chains (Fig. 5). However, the Vα14+ TCR is expressed at lower levels than is the Vα4+ TCR. This observation may reflect the in vivo situation in which a TCR on NK1.1 T cells is expressed at lower levels than on conventional α/β T cells. To assess whether impaired cell surface expression of the TCR wild-type β and β-loop− chain together with the Vα14+ TCR α chain is due to a problem of pairing, TCRs from the transfectants were immunoprecipitated with anti-Vβ8 mAb. As can be seen in Fig. 5 B, the TCR α chain can be coimmunoprecipitated with the TCR β chain in all transfectants expressing the TCR on the cell surface. In contrast, the Vα14+ TCR α chain cannot be coimmunoprecipitated with the mutant β chain in detectable amounts. This result implies that the Vα14+ TCR α chain pairs very poorly with the Vβ8+ TCR β chain lacking the Cβ FG loop. It is worth pointing out that in the hybridomas producing the wild-type β and Vα14+ chains, many fewer assembled α/β dimers can be immunoprecipitated compared with control Vβ8.2/Vα4 dimers. This latter result suggests that mere physical constraints on the assembly of the β chain with the Vα14+ TCR α chain exist and is consistent with the low TCR expression on normal NK1.1 T cells.
Next, we assessed whether the NK1.1 α/β+ T cells that do develop in TCR β-loop− transgenic mice express the Vα14+ TCR α chain by performing RT-PCR on single NK1.1 CD3+ T cells sorted from TCR-β and β-loop− transgenic mice. As summarized in Table, the frequency of NK1.1 T cells expressing Vα14 is not significantly decreased in TCR β-loop− transgenic mice in comparison to wild-type TCR-β transgenic animals. One has to keep in mind, however, that there are few NK1.1 T cells in the mutant mice, and these express much lower levels of TCR (Fig. 3). This, together with biochemical data, strongly suggests that in TCR β-loop− transgenic mice, both the impaired development of NK1.1 T cells and their weak TCR expression is due to the physical constraints on the assembly of the β chain lacking the Cβ FG loop with the Vα14+ TCR α chain.
|.||Number of NK1.1+CD3+ cells .|
|Vβ8.2+ .||Vα14+ .|
|.||Number of NK1.1+CD3+ cells .|
|Vβ8.2+ .||Vα14+ .|
Liver cell suspensions from TCR-β or β-loop− transgenic mice were double stained with anti-NK1.1 and anti-CD3 mAbs. Double-stained cells were sorted individually to perform RT-PCR as described in Materials and Methods. cDNA encoding the Vα14+ TCR α chain was amplified as well as the Vβ8.2+ TCR β chain used as positive control for the reaction. Numbers in parentheses represent percentages of Vβ8.2+ cells that were Vα14+. A representative experiment is shown here.
We have previously shown that in conventional T cells expressing Vβ8.2, deletion of the Cβ FG loop has no effect on Vα 7 and Jα repertoire usage (our unpublished data). This result suggested that no drastic conformational changes in the TCR β chain were created by the mutation. However, in this study we clearly show that expression of the Vα14+ α chain is sensitive to deletion of the Cβ FG loop. Therefore, deletion of the Cβ FG loop must create some subtle change in TCR β chain conformation. It seems that expression of the Vα14+ α chain does not allow much structural flexibility of the TCR, as it is particularly sensitive to TCR β chain conformation. Its expression might impose stringent constraints on α/β assembly. This could at least partially explain why the Vβ repertoire of NK1.1 T cells is relatively limited 30. Pairing with the apparently conformation-sensitive Vα14-Jα281 TCR α chain could be the initial pressure on Vβ usage in NK1.1 T cells 19. Recently, results obtained by using Vα14-transgenic mice suggested that selection was the main force in shaping the NK1.1 T cell repertoire 31. Here we have shown that in addition to selection, differential Vα–Vβ pairing can also potentially influence the NK1.1 T cell diversity. In summary, our data show that subtle changes in the TCR β chain conformation (which do not seem to affect conventional Vβ8.2+ α/β TCRs) can substantially alter pairing with the Vα14+ α chain and impair NK1.1 T cell development.
We thank R. MacDonald for providing total RNA from NK1.1 α/β+ T cell hybridoma. We are grateful to Susan Gilfillan and Ed Palmer for critical reading of the manuscript.
The Basel Institute for Immunology was founded and is supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.