Pregnant rabbits were sensitized to unrelated does by skin transplantation. The offspring of these sensitized animals rejected skin from the same donor in a markedly accelerated fashion. The transplacental passage of agents responsible for homograft rejection is therefore suggested. Since accelerated rejection rather than enhancement occurred, more than the usual humoral antibodies must have been thus transmitted. The presence of another antibody-like substance is postulated. This appears to be sessile in nature, usually fixed to lymphocytes, but transmissible without these cells under special circumstances, such as occur in micropore chambers or hemochorial placentae. These allow the prolonged dose contact of sensitized and non-sensitized lymphocytes, and thus may permit the transfer of this, usually sessile, but apparently non-fixed antibody.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 September 1963
Article|
September 01 1963
TRANSPLACENTAL TRANSMISSION OF HOMOTRANSPLANTATION ANTIBODIES
Nicholas A. Halasz,
Nicholas A. Halasz
From the Departments of Surgery, Harbor General Hospital, and the University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Torrance
Search for other works by this author on:
Marshall J. Orloff
Marshall J. Orloff
From the Departments of Surgery, Harbor General Hospital, and the University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Torrance
Search for other works by this author on:
Nicholas A. Halasz
From the Departments of Surgery, Harbor General Hospital, and the University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Torrance
Marshall J. Orloff
From the Departments of Surgery, Harbor General Hospital, and the University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Torrance
Received:
May 06 1963
Online ISSN: 1540-9538
Print ISSN: 0022-1007
Copyright © 1963, by The Rockefeller Institute
1963
J Exp Med (1963) 118 (3): 353–358.
Article history
Received:
May 06 1963
Citation
Nicholas A. Halasz, Marshall J. Orloff; TRANSPLACENTAL TRANSMISSION OF HOMOTRANSPLANTATION ANTIBODIES . J Exp Med 1 September 1963; 118 (3): 353–358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.118.3.353
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Email alerts
Advertisement