The mitotic apparatus (MA) of the giant ameba, Chaos carolinensis, has characteristic sequences of microtubule arrays and deployment of nuclear envelope fragments. If mitotic organisms are subjected to 2°C for 5 min, the MA microtubules are completely degraded, and the envelope fragments are released from the chromosomes which remain condensed but lose their metaphase-plate orientation. On warming, microtubules reform but show partial loss of their parallel alignment; displacement of the envelope fragments persists or is increased by microtubule reformation. This study demonstrates that cooling causes destruction of microtubules and intermicrotubular cross-bonds and further shows that such controlled dissolution and reformation can provide an in vivo test sequence for studies on the effects of inhibitor-compounds on microtubule subunit aggregation. Urea, at the comparatively low concentration of 0.8 M, inhibited reformation following cooling and rewarming but was ineffective in altering microtubules that had formed before treatment.
Article|
July 01 1967
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF MITOSIS IN AMEBAE : III. Cold and Urea Treatments: A Basis for Tests of Direct Effects of Mitotic Inhibitors on Microtubule Formation
L. E. Roth
L. E. Roth
From the Committee on Cell Biology and the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50010.
Search for other works by this author on:
L. E. Roth
From the Committee on Cell Biology and the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50010.
Dr. Roth's present address is the Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66502
Received:
November 29 1966
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
Copyright © 1967 by The Rockefeller University Press
1967
J Cell Biol (1967) 34 (1): 47–59.
Article history
Received:
November 29 1966
Citation
L. E. Roth; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF MITOSIS IN AMEBAE : III. Cold and Urea Treatments: A Basis for Tests of Direct Effects of Mitotic Inhibitors on Microtubule Formation . J Cell Biol 1 July 1967; 34 (1): 47–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.34.1.47
Download citation file: