Nuclear speckles (NSs) serve as splicing factor storage sites. In this study, we unexpectedly found that many endogenous intronless mRNAs, which do not undergo splicing, associate with NSs. These associations do not require transcription, polyadenylation, or the polyA tail. Rather, exonic splicing enhancers present in intronless mRNAs and their binding partners, SR proteins, promote intronless mRNA localization to NSs. Significantly, speckle targeting of mRNAs promotes the recruitment of the TREX export complex and their TREX-dependent nuclear export. Furthermore, TREX, which accumulates in NSs, is required for releasing intronless mRNAs from NSs, whereas NXF1, which is mainly detected at nuclear pores, is not. Upon NXF1 depletion, the TREX protein UAP56 loses speckle concentration but coaccumulates with intronless mRNAs and polyA RNAs in the nucleoplasm, and these RNAs are trapped in NSs upon UAP56 codepletion. We propose that the export-competent messenger RNP assembly mainly occurs in NSs for intronless mRNAs and that entering NSs serves as a quality control step in mRNA export.
Nuclear speckles (NSs; also known as splicing-factor compartments, interchromatin granules, or SC35 domains) are dynamic nuclear structures located in mammalian cells. Although it has been 50 yr since their initial discovery (Swift, 1959), functions of NSs are still unclear (Lamond and Spector, 2003; Spector and Lamond, 2011). Currently, the only widely accepted function of NSs is that of the storage/modification sites of splicing factors (Spector and Lamond, 2011). Multiple studies have demonstrated that splicing is required for the association of mRNAs with NSs (Johnson et al., 2000; Melčák et al., 2001; Ishihama et al., 2008; Funatsu, 2009; Dias et al., 2010). Although it remains highly controversial whether splicing occurs in NSs, accumulating evidence has suggested their involvement in splicing regulation. Splicing was thought to occur at perichromatin fibrils surrounding NSs (Fu and Maniatis, 1990; Spector et al., 1991; Cmarko et al., 1999). Different from this view, there are also studies suggesting that splicing occurs directly in NSs (Johnson et al., 2000; Melčák et al., 2001; Hall et al., 2006; Ishihama et al., 2008; Funatsu, 2009; Dias et al., 2010). More recently, using antibodies that specifically detect active spliceosomes, Girard et al. (2012) reported that both of these views are true. Their data indicate that 80% of splicing events occur cotranscriptionally at the periphery of NSs, whereas 20% of them occur posttranscriptionally within these subnuclear structures (Girard et al., 2012).
Except for splicing factors, other important mRNA metabolic factors such as mRNA export factors and components of the exon–junction complex are also enriched in NSs (Mayeda et al., 1999; Kataoka et al., 2000; Zhou et al., 2000; Gatfield et al., 2001; Masuda et al., 2005). In the nuclei of mammalian cells, a significant portion of polyA RNAs is present in NSs (Carter et al., 1991; Visa et al., 1993; Huang et al., 1994; Dias et al., 2010). When components of the TREX complex that serves as a key nuclear export adaptor are depleted, polyA RNAs as well as mRNAs derived from intron-containing reporter genes are almost exclusively accumulated in these subnuclear structures (Sträßer et al., 2002; Dias et al., 2010; Chi et al., 2013). Considering that the vast majority of splicing events occur at speckle surrounding sites, these results suggest that a significant fraction of spliced mRNAs might enter NSs after splicing. Consistent with this possibility, it has been shown that the COL1A1 mRNA is almost entirely spliced before entering NSs (Johnson et al., 2000). Why do spliced mRNAs enter NSs? One possibility is that these spliced mRNAs might be assembled into export-competent messenger RNPs (mRNPs) in these domains. In disagreement with this possibility, it was reported that speckle-localized polyA RNAs are trapped in this foci and not to be released to the cytoplasm (Huang et al., 1994). However, to date, direct evidence that NSs are involved in mRNA export is still lacking.
Approximately 3% of protein-coding genes do not have introns. Although they represent the minority in the human genome, intronless genes mostly encode proteins with fundamental functions such as signal transduction factors and regulatory proteins important for growth, proliferation, and development (Grzybowska, 2012). Since splicing does not occur to naturally intronless mRNAs, they are thought not to pass through NSs (Johnson et al., 2000; Melčák et al., 2001; Hall et al., 2006; Ishihama et al., 2008; Funatsu, 2009; Dias et al., 2010; Lei et al., 2011). Consistent with this view, a previous study reported that three naturally intronless mRNAs, including HSPB3, IFN-α1, and IFN-β1, do not associate with NSs (Lei et al., 2011). Intronless mRNAs are exported to the cytoplasm by using the same machinery as spliced ones (Palazzo et al., 2007; Lei et al., 2011; Akef et al., 2013; Chi et al., 2014). The lack of association of naturally intronless mRNAs with NSs does not support the possibility that mRNA export factors are recruited in these domains. However, more recent studies reported that some cis-acting elements that were known to function in mRNA export could also promote speckle association of intronless reporter transcripts. For example, the signal sequence coding region (SSCR) from the mouse major histocompatibility complex H2kb gene promotes both speckle association and nuclear export of a reporter cDNA transcript (Palazzo et al., 2007; Akef et al., 2013). Further, influenza viral unspliced M1 mRNA is also targeted to NSs (Mor et al., 2016). However, currently, it remains unclear whether naturally intronless mRNAs associate with NSs or where they are assembled into export-competent mRNPs.
In this study, we unexpectedly found that many naturally intronless mRNAs, including eight exogenously expressed and four endogenous ones, associate with NSs. Mechanistically, exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs) present in intronless mRNAs and their binding partners SR proteins promote their speckle association. Functionally, speckle association of intronless mRNAs enhances mRNA export by facilitating recruitment of the TREX complex. Further, we provide evidence supporting the notion that TREX recruitment mainly occurs in NSs. Given that the current view for NSs is that they are the sites for storage of splicing factors and regulation of splicing, our study expands the role of these subnuclear regions in assembling export-competent mRNPs and suggests that trafficking to NSs could be an important quality control step in mRNA export.
Exogenous naturally intronless mRNAs enter NSs rapidly after transcription
To initially obtain some clue where naturally intronless mRNAs distribute in the nucleus before nuclear export, we performed DNA microinjection experiments. We randomly picked eight intronless genes, including HSPA1A, HSPB9, GPR119, GPR32, CJUN, JUND, CLDN3, and IFNE, and cloned the coding regions into reporter constructs. These reporter DNA constructs were microinjected into the nuclei of HeLa cells, followed by FISH analysis to detect the corresponding mRNAs. For controls (Cntls), the wG (β-globin pre-mRNA) and the cG (β-globin cDNA) constructs were also microinjected. 20 min after microinjection, α-amanitin was added to inhibit transcription. To avoid extensive cG mRNA degradation, we took the images at 30 min after transcription inhibition when the levels of the two reporter mRNAs seemed similar (Valencia et al., 2008). Consistent with a previous study (Dias et al., 2010), the wG mRNA was largely distributed in nuclear foci that colocalized with SRSF2, a standard marker for NSs, whereas the cG mRNA mostly diffused in the nucleoplasm (Fig. 1 A, Cntls). For naturally intronless mRNAs, different time points were taken to observe their nuclear distribution as well as cytoplasmic accumulation. Specifically, FISH images are shown at 1 h (CJUN and JUND), 2 h (HSPA1A), or 4 h (all the others) after the addition of α-amanitin (Fig. 1 A). Significantly, in the nucleus, all of these intronless mRNAs are localized in specific foci that generally colocalized with SRSF2 (Fig. 1 A), and the colocalization index was 0.5 (Fig. 1 B). These data indicate that many naturally intronless mRNAs, but not artificial cDNA transcript, derived from reporter DNA constructs associate with NSs.
To investigate the kinetics of speckle targeting of intronless mRNAs and to examine whether speckle-associated intronless mRNAs could be exported to the cytoplasm, time courses with the use of FISH and immunofluorescence (IF) were performed for the JUND and HSPA1A constructs (Figs. 1 C and S1 A). Representative confocal images of a cell at each time point are shown. Significantly, for the JUND mRNA, the FISH signal was apparently detected in NSs as early as 0 min after the addition of α-amanitin (20 min after injection; Fig. 1, C and D), indicating that intronless mRNAs enter NSs rapidly after transcription. The mRNA was still mostly concentrated at NSs at 30 min. Since 60 min, the JUND mRNA started to accumulate in the cytoplasm, accompanied by a gradually reduced signal in NSs. At 120 min, the mRNA was completely detected in the cytoplasm. This result suggests that the JUND mRNA distributed in NSs could be released to the cytoplasm. However, it was also possible that the mRNA localized in NSs had been degraded rather than released to the cytoplasm. To examine this possibility, we inhibited nuclear mRNA degradation pathways by depleting the 5′-to-3′ ribonuclease XRN2 as well as MTR4, an essential cofactor of the nuclear exosome harboring both endo- and 3′-to-5′ exoribonuclease activity (Fig. 1, C–E; and Fig. S1, B–F; Mitchell et al., 1997; Allmang et al., 1999; West et al., 2004; Schilders et al., 2007; Schneider et al., 2007; Lebreton et al., 2008; Fasken et al., 2011; Lubas et al., 2011). The overall JUND FISH signal was increased ∼1.25-fold, and the levels of exosome targets were elevated in these cells, evident of inhibited degradation (Figs. 1 E and S1, C–F; Fan et al., 2017). However, the kinetics of JUND mRNA speckle exit was similar to that of Cntl cells, supporting the notion that speckle-localized JUND mRNA was not degraded but was released to the cytoplasm (Fig. 1, C–E). Importantly, a similar observation was obtained with the HSPA1A mRNA (Fig. S1, A–C and F), although both the entry into and the exit from NSs was slower than the JUND mRNA. We noted that upon JUND mRNA export completion, most of SRSF2 lost its regular speckled pattern but diffused in the nucleoplasm of all injected cells (Figs. 1 C and S1 G). A similar phenomenon was observed when rapidly exported spliced mRNAs were introduced to the cells (Dias et al., 2010; Shi et al., 2015). This is consistent with the notion that NS components dynamically traffic between these domains and the nucleoplasm (Misteli, 2001). Together, these data indicate that naturally intronless mRNAs enter NSs rapidly after transcription and that speckle-associated intronless mRNAs could be exported to the cytoplasm.
Endogenous naturally intronless mRNAs are detected within NSs
We next examined whether endogenous naturally intronless mRNAs associate with NSs. Four relatively abundant endogenous intronless mRNAs in HeLa cells, including JUND, HSPA1A, RHOB, and ZXDB, were chosen for this analysis. The long noncoding RNA NEAT1 was used as a Cntl not localizing in NSs (Bond and Fox, 2009; Chen and Carmichael, 2009). Fields of multiple cells are shown in Fig. 2 A, and a representative cell is shown in Fig. 2 (B–F). Apparent nuclear FISH signals were detected for these intronless mRNAs, probably due to the lack of the coupling of mRNA export to splicing. Confocal microscopic analysis revealed that all four endogenous intronless mRNAs generally colocalized with SRSF2 in the nucleus, whereas NEAT1 did not (Fig. 2, A–F). Higher magnification of the images showed that most of these intronless mRNAs localized in the center of NSs, although some of them were detected at the periphery (Fig. 2, B–E). Z stack images and 3D video reconstruction further confirmed the localization of intronless mRNAs within NSs (Fig. 2 G and Videos 1, 2, 3, and 4). Together, our data suggest that many endogenous naturally intronless mRNAs associate with NSs.
Notably, a nonspecific probe did not detect any apparent signal, and the FISH signals were apparently reduced in cells treated with transcript-specific antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), demonstrating the specificities of the FISH signals (Fig. 3, A–F). Furthermore, when transcription was inhibited with α-amanitin, FISH signals were apparently reduced in NSs, and most mRNAs were detected in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3, G–K), further supporting the notion that intronless mRNAs localized at NSs could be released to the cytoplasm.
Transcription, polyadenylation, or the polyA tail is not required for naturally intronless mRNAs entering NSs
How could naturally intronless mRNAs be targeted to NSs? As all intronless mRNAs we tested associated with NSs, we first considered whether some common processes such as transcription and polyadenylation might facilitate these associations. If true, one would expect that mRNAs synthesized and polyadenylated in vitro do not enter NSs. To investigate this possibility, we in vitro transcribed HSPA1A, GRP119, JUND, and cG (Cntl) mRNAs using T7 polymerase, followed by in vitro polyadenylation. When these mRNAs were microinjected into HeLa nuclei, at 30 min after injection, the HSPA1A, GRP119, and JUND mRNAs, but not the cG mRNA, clearly colocalized with SRSF2 (Fig. 4 A). Thus, neither transcription nor polyadenylation is required for naturally intronless mRNAs entering NSs.
Another common feature of intronless mRNAs is the polyA tail. To examine its potential roles, we injected in vitro–transcribed HSPA1A, GPR119, JUND, and cG mRNAs without a polyA tail. As shown in Fig. 4 B, 30 min after injection, polyA- naturally intronless mRNAs but not the cG mRNA were apparently accumulated in NSs, indicating that speckle targeting of intronless mRNAs does not depend on the polyA tail.
Cis-acting elements facilitate intronless mRNA association with NSs
We next considered the possibility that some cis-acting elements might function in targeting intronless mRNAs to NSs. Among the eight exogenous intronless mRNAs we tested, HSPA1A showed the most significant speckle-association phenotype. We thus separated the HSPA1A gene into nine overlapping fragments of 200–300 bp in length and cloned them into an expression plasmid (Fig. 5 A). When these plasmids were transfected, the no. 2 and no. 9 fragments apparently localized in speckled nuclear foci, whereas others were mostly cytoplasmic at 24 h after transfection (Fig. 5 B). We confirmed speckle associations of the no. 2 and no. 9 fragments with microinjection experiments (Fig. 5 C). These data suggest that these HSPA1A fragments might contain speckle-targeting signals.
To examine whether no. 2 and no. 9 fragments can facilitate mRNA association with NSs, we inserted them into the 3′ of the β-globin and Smad cDNA transcripts (cG and cS mRNA, respectively), which otherwise do not associate with NSs (Fig. 5, D and E; Dias et al., 2010). Significantly, with either fragment, the cG and cS mRNAs were now apparently colocalized with SRSF2 (Fig. 5, D and E). We thus named no. 2 and no. 9 fragments as speckle-targeting element (STE) 1 and 2, respectively. Together, these data indicate that specific intronless mRNA sequences function in targeting them to NSs.
It was possible that the cytoplasmic localized HSPA1A fragments could have passed through NSs before nuclear export. Indeed, when another three randomly picked fragments, no. 1, no. 5, and no. 6, were microinjected, they also apparently associated with NSs at 30 min after injection (Fig. S2, A and B). The observation that multiple RNA fragments show speckle localization raised the possibility that speckle-targeting sequences are interspersed, rather than localized in a specific region, in intronless mRNAs. Consistent with this possibility, when the JUND coding region was separated into three fragments, all of them associated with NSs to a different extent (Fig. S2, C and D).
ESEs function in speckle targeting of intronless mRNAs via SR proteins
What could be the interspersed speckle targeting sequences in intronless mRNAs? ESEs are purine-rich RNA sequences that stimulate splicing by recruiting SR proteins (Tacke and Manley, 1995; Liu et al., 1998, 2000; Blencowe, 2000; Wu et al., 2005; Cáceres and Hurst, 2013). Recently, a specific subgroup of ESEs was reported to be overrepresented in intronless genes more than in intergenic sequences (Savisaar and Hurst, 2016). We found that on average, each intronless gene contains 30 copies of these ESEs (Fig. S3, A and B). This led us to speculate that ESEs might function in targeting intronless mRNAs to NSs. The two STEs we identified do contain multiple ESEs (Fig. S3 C). We chose two of the most enriched ESEs in the HSPA1A gene, 5′-GACCTG-3′ and 5′-GAGGAG-3′, for further functional study (Fig. S3 D). Significantly, insertion of seven tandem repeats of either of these ESEs resulted in the apparent association of the cG mRNA with NSs (Fig. 6 A). This speckle targeting was not due to cryptic splicing (Fig. S3 E). These data suggest that ESEs are indeed sufficient for driving intronless mRNAs to NSs.
By considering the prevalent binding of ESEs with SR proteins, it was possible that they promote speckle association of intronless mRNAs via SR proteins. To investigate this possibility, we examined whether depletion of SR proteins affects speckle association of intronless mRNAs. Many SR proteins share common binding motifs and often functionally substitute for one another (Chandler et al., 1997). Thus, we used the well-characterized FP RNA element (referred to in this study as ΔSR RNA) that binds to multiple SR proteins and can titrate SR proteins (Sun et al., 1993; Dirksen et al., 2000; Li et al., 2000). The FPD RNA element (referred to in this study as the Cntl RNA), which does not bind to SR proteins (Sun et al., 1993; Dirksen et al., 2000; Li et al., 2000), was used as a Cntl. No apparent effect on speckle formation was detected with either RNA element. Significantly, when the ΔSR RNA, but not the Cntl RNA, was expressed, speckle association of the cG-ESE2 mRNA was apparently weakened (Fig. 6 B), indicating that SR proteins are required for ESE-mediated speckle targeting.
We next examined the effect of the ΔSR RNA on the distribution of endogenous intronless mRNAs including HSPA1A and RHOB. No apparent difference was detected in speckle association of these mRNAs in cells treated or not treated with the Cntl RNA (Fig. 6, C and D, Cntl; comparing circled cells with noncircled cells). In contrast, in cells expressing the ΔSR RNA, speckle association was significantly weakened compared with that in the neighboring untreated cells (Fig. 6, C and D, ΔSR; comparing circled cells with noncircled cells). These results indicate that speckle targeting of endogenous intronless mRNAs depends on SR proteins. To further corroborate the role of SR proteins in intronless mRNA speckle targeting, we next knocked down a panel of SR proteins and assessed speckle localization of the endogenous HSPA1A and RHOB mRNAs (Figs. 6 E and S4, A–C). Considering that SRSF2 was knocked down in some of the samples, to give a fair comparison of the effect of different SRSF proteins, we used PABPN1 as the NSs marker in this experiment (Krause et al., 1994). Significantly, co-knockdown of SRSF1/3/7 apparently abolished speckle localization of these mRNAs, and co-knockdown of SRSF1/6/7 also had a moderate effect (Figs. 6 E and S4, B and C). Together, these data demonstrate that SR proteins are required for targeting intronless mRNAs to NSs.
To examine these roles of SR proteins in a more direct way, we tethered the MS2-tagged SR protein SRSF2 to the cG mRNA containing six MS2-binding sites (cG-M6). MS2-GFP was used as a negative Cntl. As shown in Fig. 6 F, tethering MS2-SRSF2 but not MS2-GFP resulted in the apparent association of the cG-M6 mRNA with NSs. Note that the cG mRNA without MS2-binding site did not show speckle localization. Together, these data indicate that ESEs present in intronless mRNAs promote their speckle association via SR proteins.
Speckle association of intronless mRNAs promotes TREX recruitment and mRNA export
We next sought to investigate the functional relevance for intronless mRNA associating with NSs. Considering that mRNA export factors are also enriched in NSs (Zhou et al., 2000; Gatfield et al., 2001; Masuda et al., 2005), we speculated that this association might facilitate the assembly of export-competent mRNPs. If true, targeting cDNA transcripts, which cannot efficiently recruit TREX and are mostly retained in the nucleus, to NSs might promote TREX recruitment and mRNA export. To examine this possibility, we microinjected cG, cG-ESE1, and cG-ESE2 reporter constructs and examined their nucleocytoplasmic (N/C) distribution 4 h after injection. As previously reported (Valencia et al., 2008; Dias et al., 2010), the cG mRNA was largely retained in the nucleus (Fig. 7 A). Significantly, apparent cytoplasmic accumulation was observed with the cG-ESE1 and cG-ESE2 mRNAs (Fig. 7 A), suggesting that ESEs indeed promote mRNA export. To further verify this, we next transfected these constructs into HeLa cells and performed subcellular fractionation. Western analysis confirmed the purities of nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions (Fig. 7 B). Reverse transcription–quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) data revealed that with ESEs, the N/C ratios of the cG mRNA apparently decreased (Fig. 7 B). Together, these results indicate that ESEs promotes intronless mRNA export.
Considering that multiple SR proteins interact with the mRNA export receptor NXF1 and serve as NXF1 adaptors (Huang et al., 2003, 2004; Müller-McNicoll et al., 2016), it was possible that ESE-mediated mRNA export was a result of direct recruitment of NXF1 by SR proteins. If true, TREX, which serves as another nuclear export adaptor, would not be required for ESE-mediated mRNA export. However, this is not the case. Knockdown of the TREX component UAP56 apparently inhibited ESE-mediated mRNA export (Fig. 7, C and D), indicating that the effect of ESEs on mRNA export was not due to SR-mediated NXF1 recruitment.
To examine whether ESE-mediated export promotion was a result of enhanced TREX recruitment, UV cross-linking RNA immunoprecipitations (IPs; RIPs) with an antibody to the TREX component ALYREF, an RNA-binding protein, were performed. The cG and wG mRNAs were used as the negative and the positive Cntl for TREX recruitment, respectively (Masuda et al., 2005; Fan et al., 2017). As expected, ALYREF associated with the wG mRNA apparently more than the cG mRNA (Fig. 7 E). Significantly, compared with the cG mRNA, ALYREF associations with the cG-ESE1 and cG-ESE2 mRNAs were strengthened up to fourfold (Fig. 7 E), suggesting that ESE-mediated speckle association indeed promoted TREX recruitment.
It was also possible that ESE-mediated export promotion was a result of sequence-dependent TREX recruitment, rather than speckle association. In this case, depleting SR proteins should not affect ESE-mediated mRNA export. However, expression of the ΔSR RNA but not the Cntl RNA significantly inhibited the cytoplasmic accumulation of the cG-ESE2 mRNA (Fig. 7 F), suggesting that ESE-mediated speckle association, but not the ESE itself, was important for mRNA export promotion. Consistent with this view, co-knockdown of SRSF1/3/7 also resulted in nuclear retention of endogenous HSPA1A and RHOB mRNAs (Figs. 6 E and 7 G). The lack of apparent effect of the ΔSR RNA on the cytoplasmic accumulation of endogenous intronless mRNAs (Fig. 6, C and D) was likely because the mRNAs that had been exported to the cytoplasm before SR titration were still detectable.
To further investigate the effect of speckle association on mRNA export, we next examined whether tethering SRSF2, which neither interacts with NXF1 nor has a direct role in mRNA export (Huang et al., 2003, 2004; Müller-McNicoll et al., 2016), promoted mRNA cytoplasmic accumulation. As shown in Fig. 7 H, 4 h after injection, the cG-M6 mRNA but not the cG mRNA was apparently detected in the cytoplasm when coinjected with MS2-SRSF2. Similar results were obtained when these constructs were transfected and followed by subcellular fractionation and RT-qPCRs (Fig. S4 D). Importantly, export promotion by SRSF2 tethering was also dependent on TREX as depletion of UAP56 eliminated this effect (Fig. 7 I). Together, these data indicate that speckle association promotes intronless mRNA export by facilitating TREX recruitment.
Evidence that TREX recruitment mainly occurs in NSs
Considering that TREX components are concentrated at NSs (Zhou et al., 2000; Gatfield et al., 2001; Masuda et al., 2005) and speckle targeting promotes TREX binding, it is possible that TREX recruitment mainly occurs in these domains. In support of this possibility, TREX depletion results in retention of polyA RNAs and mRNAs derived from intron-containing reporter genes in NSs (Dias et al., 2010; Chi et al., 2013). To further investigate this possibility, we examined how intronless mRNA distribution was affected by depletion of the TREX component UAP56. Significantly, the exogenously expressed JUND and HSPA1A mRNAs were largely detected in NSs without apparently reduced levels up to 120 and 300 min, respectively, when they were completely released to the cytoplasm in normal cells (Figs. 1 C and 8, A and B; and Figs. S1 A and S4 E). Importantly, exclusive accumulation of the endogenous RHOB, HSPA1A, and ZXDB mRNAs in NSs was also observed in UAP56-depleted cells (Fig. 8, D and E; and Fig. S4 F). Note that this accumulation was not a result of altered mRNA levels as among three endogenous mRNA we examined, only the level of HSPA1A mRNA was affected (Fig. S4 G). These results are consistent with the notion that TREX recruitment occurs in NSs.
However, it was also possible that TREX recruitment might take place outside of NSs, and when UAP56 was knocked down, intronless mRNAs were trapped in NSs due to their associations with SR proteins. In this case, one would expect that inhibiting mRNA export in other ways would result in similar speckle accumulation of intronless mRNAs. However, although depletion of NXF1, which mainly localizes at nuclear pores (Segref et al., 1997; Forler et al., 2004), resulted in nuclear export inhibitions, the RHOB, HSPA1A, and ZXDB mRNAs were detected not only inside but also apparently outside of NSs (Fig. 8, C–E; and Fig. S4 F). Importantly, similar accumulation pattern was also observed with total polyA RNAs (Fig. 8 F). These data suggest that TREX, but not NXF1, is required for mRNA release from NSs.
Had mRNAs accumulated in the nucleoplasm of NXF1 depleted cells passed through NSs and recruited TREX? If they had, these mRNAs would have been blocked in these domains in NXF1 and UAP56 co-knockdown cells. Indeed, both polyA RNAs and the endogenous HSPA1A mRNA were mainly detected in NSs in these cells (Fig. 9, A–C). As previously reported, UAP56 is mainly detected in NSs in Cntl cells (Fig. 9, D and E, Cntl KD; Gatfield et al., 2001). Intriguingly, upon NXF1 depletion, UAP56 apparently lost its speckle concentration but mostly diffused throughout the nucleoplasm and partially colocalized with polyA RNAs and HSPA1A mRNA (Fig. 9, D and E, NXF1 KD). These results indicate that the mRNAs accumulated outside of NSs upon NXF1 depletion had passed through NSs and recruited TREX. Together, these results from every angle strongly support the notion that TREX recruitment mainly occurs in NSs.
As a general rule, nuclear bodies serve to concentrate proteins involved in similar processes in a confined space, probably to enhance reaction efficiency and facilitate regulation. NSs have long been known for their relevance in splicing (Lerner et al., 1981; Spector et al., 1983, 1991; Fu and Maniatis, 1990; Fu, 1993; Lamond and Spector, 2003; Spector and Lamond, 2011). Except for splicing factors, mRNA export factors are also enriched in these subnuclear structures (Zhou et al., 2000; Gatfield et al., 2001; Masuda et al., 2005). Depletion of mRNA export factors such as TREX proteins results in retention of polyA RNAs and spliced reporter mRNAs in NSs (Dias et al., 2010; Chi et al., 2013; Shi et al., 2015). Based on previous studies and our data, we propose that NSs are sites for the assembly of many export-competent mRNPs (Fig. 9 F). mRNAs derived from intron-containing genes associate with NSs dependent on splicing (Johnson et al., 2000; Melčák et al., 2001; Ishihama et al., 2008; Dias et al., 2010), whereas intronless mRNAs enter these domains via ESEs where they probably recruit mRNA export factors using specific cis-acting elements, e.g., cytoplasmic accumulation regions (CARs; Lei et al., 2011, 2013). On one hand, recruitment of mRNA export factors in NSs is efficient, probably due to their enrichment. On the other hand, aberrant mRNAs that cannot be targeted to NSs, such as cDNA transcripts and defectively processed mRNAs, could be limited for the access of mRNA export factors and thus are mostly retained and degraded in the nucleus. Our study adds a new layer of function to NSs in the assembly of export-competent mRNPs and supports the notion that entering NSs might be an important quality control step in mRNA export. We note that since mRNAs can be diverse and differences in cell types may influence RNA processing, the generality of the function of NSs in mRNA export remains to be studied.
Although it is controversial whether cotranscriptional splicing occurs in the center of NSs or at surrounding sites, multiple studies have shown that posttranscriptional splicing occurs in these domains (Girard et al., 2012; Boutz et al., 2015). Splicing promotes mRNA export by enhancing recruitment of mRNA export factors, i.e., TREX components (Zhou et al., 2000; Masuda et al., 2005; Chi et al., 2013). This conclusion was drawn mainly based on the observation that compared with cDNA transcripts, TREX recruitment to the corresponding spliced mRNAs was apparently enhanced. This enhancement has been thought to be due to physical interactions between splicing factors and mRNA export factors. Although several potential functional interactions have been identified, solid evidence is still lacking (Chi et al., 2013; Gromadzka et al., 2016). We found that speckle targeting of β-globin cDNA transcript, which otherwise diffuse and are retained in the nucleoplasm, in two different ways significantly enhanced mRNA export (Fig. 7, A, B, and H; and Fig. S4 D). This finding raised the possibility that the effect of splicing on promoting mRNA export might in part be due to speckle association. Consistent with this possibility, the sequence of SSCR that promotes nuclear export of cDNA transcripts also facilitates speckle targeting (Palazzo et al., 2007; Akef et al., 2013). Further, depletion of ALYREF resulted in the trapping of the viral unspliced M1 mRNA into NSs and enhanced its splicing, suggesting cross-talk between NSs and intronless mRNA export (Mor et al., 2016). In addition, we previously found that a subelement in the posttranscriptional regulatory element (SEP1) of hepatitis B viral RNAs promoted nuclear export of cDNA transcripts (Chi et al., 2014). We revisited the localization of the cG-SEP1 mRNA and found that it also traffics into NSs (Fig. S5). We cannot exclude the possibility that speckle targeting and export promotion resulted from both SSCR and SEP1 are independent events. However, together with the findings that ESE and SR protein-mediated speckle association enhances TREX recruitment and mRNA export, we speculate that many export-promoting elements might execute their roles partially by facilitating speckle targeting. A previous study reported that insertion of an intron in U snRNAs resulted in their export via mRNA export pathway (Ohno et al., 2002). It is possible that this export pathway switch was due to the association of RNAs with different nuclear bodies.
On average, 30 ESEs are present in each intronless gene. This explains why multiple RNA fragments show speckle associations. Further, we note that since we studied only two ESEs, it remains possible that different ESEs have varied ability in facilitating mRNA speckle targeting. This, and the fact that intronless genes contain different numbers of ESEs, might explain why different intronless mRNAs associate with NSs to a varied extent. Although we detected the apparent association of intronless mRNAs with NSs, it remains possible that speckle targeting of these mRNAs is not very efficient and those that cannot traffic into these domains are degraded in the nucleoplasm. In support of this possibility, compared with spliced mRNAs, intronless mRNAs more tend to be degraded by the nuclear exosome (Fan et al., 2017). Further, speckle association does not seem to be a definite requisite for intronless mRNA export as intronless mRNAs that do not apparently associate with NSs could be exported (Lei et al., 2011). In addition, replication-dependent histone mRNAs that are known to mainly localize in histone locus bodies are exported via directly recruiting the mRNA export receptor NXF1 (Huang and Steitz, 2001; Huang et al., 2003; Marzluff et al., 2008). We speculate that intronless mRNAs that do not enter NSs might evolve specific mechanisms for efficiently recruiting mRNA export factors diffusing in the nucleoplasm. Further studies are required to understand these mechanisms.
Materials and methods
Plasmids and antibodies
To construct naturally intronless reporter plasmids, the coding sequence of HSPA1A, HSPB9, GPR119, GPR32, CJUN, JUND, CLDN3, and IFNE were inserted to pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). HSPA1A and JUND fragments were cloned into the pcDNA3. cG, cG-M6, wG, and cS constructs were described previously (Valencia et al., 2008; Shi et al., 2015). The sequence of cG was inserted into the STE1 or STE2 construct to make the cG-STE1 or cG-STE2 plasmid. Seven tandem repeats of 5′-GACCTG-3′ or 5′-GAGGAG-3′ were inserted into the cG construct to make the cG-ESE1 and cG-ESE2 constructs. To construct GFP-MS2 plasmid, the coding sequence of MS2 was inserted to pEGFP-C1 (Takara Bio Inc.). To construct MS2-SRSF2-HA plasmid, the coding sequence of MS2-SRSF2 was cloned into pEGFP-N3 (Takara Bio Inc.) in which GFP was replaced by HA. To construct the Cntl and ΔSR RNA expression plasmid, the Cntl or ΔSR sequence was inserted into pcDNA3. The pEGFP-C3 (Takara Bio Inc.) was used as a transfection Cntl.
The antibodies against ALYREF and UAP56 were described previously (Chi et al., 2014). The SRSF2 (1:2,000, mouse; Sigma-Aldrich), XRN2 (1:500, rabbit; ProteinTech), MTR4 (1:1,000, rabbit; ABclonal), GAPDH (1:1,000, mouse; Sigma-Aldrich), digoxin (1:200, sheep; Roche), PABPN1 (1:1,000, rabbit; ABclonal), tubulin (1:1,000, mouse; Sigma-Aldrich), GFP (1:2,000, rabbit; Sigma-Aldrich), and NXF1 (1:500, rabbit; ProteinTech) antibodies were purchased. IgG was purchased from Santa Cruz. Alexa Fluor 546–, Alexa Fluor 488–, or Alexa Fluor 647–conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Life Technologies.
Cell culture, RNAi, and transfection
HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (Biochrom). siRNA and DNA transfections were performed with RNAi MAX (Invitrogen) and Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), respectively, according to the manufacturer’s protocols. ASOs were introduced to HeLa cells by using electroporation (NEPA21) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Targeting sequences of siRNAs and ASOs are shown in Table S1. Note that UAP56 and its homolog URH49 must be co–knocked down to observe an obvious export block (Kapadia et al., 2006).
Microinjections, FISH, and IF
DNA microinjection and FISH were performed as previously described (Shi et al., 2015). DNA (100 ng/µl) was microinjected into HeLa cells plated on a fibronectin-coated 20-mm coverslip at the bottom of 35-mm dishes, followed by incubation at 37°C. For each experiment, 300–400 cells were microinjected. After 20 min incubation, transcription was terminated with 4 µg/ml α-amanitin (Sigma-Aldrich), and incubation was continued for the desired period of time before fixation with 4% PFA. After incubation with 0.1% Triton X-100, the cells were hybridized with the FISH probes overnight at 37°C. After being washed with 1× SSC/50% formamide four times, the cells were stained with DAPI. The FISH probes were labeled at the 5′ end with Alexa Fluor 546 or Alexa Fluor 488 and HPLC purified. For RNA injection, the RNA (1 µg/µl) was coinjected with FITC-conjugated 70-kD dextran as an injection marker. The sequences of the vector probes and β-globin probe are shown in Table S2. For IF, SRSF2 (1:2,000), GFP (1:2,000), PABPN1 (1:1,000), and UAP56 (1:200) antibodies were used. After primary antibody incubation, cells were washed three times in 1× PBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488–, Alexa Fluor 546–, or Alexa Fluor 647–conjugated secondary antibodies 1:1,000 in blocking buffer (1× PBS, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 2 mg/ml BSA).
To detect the endogenous RNAs with SRSF2 simultaneously, HeLa cells were fixed with 3.6% formaldehyde plus 10% acetic acid in 1× PBS for 20 min, followed by three washes with 1× PBS and permeabilization with 1× PBS/0.1% Triton X-100/2mM vanadyl ribonucleoside complex (VRC) for 15 min. The cells were incubated with specific probes that were labeled with digoxin at 50°C for 16 h The targeting sequences of the transcript-specific probes are shown in Table S2. After extensive wash, cells were incubated with the digoxin and SRSF2 antibody diluted in blocking buffer for 1 h. After three washes with 1× PBS and incubation with the Alexa Flour 488–labeled anti–sheep antibody (1:1,000) for 1 h, the cells were washed with 1× PBS three times and incubated with the Alexa Fluor 546–labeled anti–mouse antibody for another 1 h, followed by DAPI staining and three washes with 1× PBS.
Confocal imaging was performed on a FLUOVIEW FV1000 microscope (Olympus) by using a 60× 1.35 NA objective lens and acquired with FV10-ASW software (Olympus) or was performed using an A1plus laser-scanning confocal microscope with a 60× 1.40 NA objective lens and acquired with NIS Elements (Nikon) software. Fluorescence microscopic images were captured with a DP72 charge-coupled device camera on IX71 microscope by using DP-BSW software (Olympus). All imaging was performed at room temperature, and all samples were covered with 1× PBS. 3D reconstitutions were performed with FV10-ASW software (Olympus).
To ensure that the colocalization index could reflect the extent of colocalization, the data were analyzed in three steps. First, it was judged whether there was a focus by the comparison of the intensity of the focus signal with that of the nucleoplasm signal (20% was considered positive). Then, colocalization of two foci was judged by comparing the peak locations of intronless mRNAs and NSs markers. The intronless mRNA peaks localizing within the central region (±5%) of the speckle peaks were considered positive. Finally, we calculated the colocalization index using the area of intronless mRNA signals divided by the area of speckle focus signal. Notably, when counting the signals of endogenous FISH, the obvious noise signals were discarded. The intensity of signals and the area under the curves were counted with ImageJ 1.33u software (National Institutes of Health). N/C ratios were calculated as described (Valencia et al., 2008). The area (AW) and the average signal intensity of the whole cell (IW) were determined separately by using the ImageJ software. Similarly, the area (AN) and the average signal intensity of the nucleus (IN) were determined. The background intensity (BIW for the whole cell, and BIN for the nucleus) was determined by using a cell without a FISH signal. The total cell signal (W) was calculated as AW × (IW − BIW). Similarly, the nuclear signal (N) was calculated as AN × (IN − BIN), and the cytoplasmic signal (C) was equal to W − N. The N/C ratio was equal to N/(W −N).
Subcellular fractionation was performed as described (Shi et al., 2017). Briefly, 4 × 105 HeLa cells were suspended in 1 ml lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 140 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5% IGEPAL, and 2 mM VRC) and incubated for 5 min on ice. The lysate was centrifuged at 1,000 g for 3 min at 4°C, and the pellet and the supernatant were kept as the nuclei and the cytoplasmic fraction, respectively. The supernatant fraction was further centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C and then collected carefully to a new tube. The nuclear pellets were subjected to one additional wash with 1 ml lysis buffer containing 0.5% deoxycholic acid and one additional wash with lysis buffer. Finally, the purified nuclei were resuspended in 100 µl lysis buffer. Nuclear or cytoplasmic RNAs were extracted by using TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich).
RIPs with UV cross-linking were performed as described with some modification (Yeo et al., 2009). Different β-globin constructs were cotransfected with the cS construct into HeLa cells. 4 h after transfection, cells were washed with cold 1× PBS and irradiated at 150 mJ/cm2 with UV. The cells were then suspended in 1 ml RIP buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 0.05% SDS, 1 mM PMSF, 2 mM VRC, and protease inhibitor cocktail), followed by 10 rounds of sonication (10-s work with 60-s rest) on ice. After centrifugation at 13,000 rpm at 4°C, the supernatants were precleared with 50 µl Dynabeads A (Invitrogen) and 20 µg/ml yeast tRNA at 4°C for 1 h. The precleared cell lysate was incubated with Dynabeads A, which were coated with the ALYREF antibody or IgG at 4°C for 4 h. The beads were washed three times with buffer I (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 M NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 0.05% SDS, and 2 mM VRC) and three times with buffer II (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 M NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 0.05% SDS, 2 mM VRC, and 1 M urea). The immunoprecipitated RNA was extracted by using TRI reagent following proteinase K treatment. RNAs were then treated with the RNase-free RQ DNase I (Promega) for 2 h at 37°C, and cDNAs were synthesized from 1 µg RNAs with random primer by using M-MLV reverse transcription (Promega). For qPCRs, cDNAs were amplified by using GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Primer sequences are listed in Table S3. For data quantification, we first calculated IP efficiency for each mRNA using immunoprecipitated mRNA divided by the corresponding input. Then, the β-globin IP efficiency/cS IP efficiency for each different β-globin construct was calculated. Further, the final relative IP efficiency of the cG mRNA was set at 1, and the ratios of other β-globin mRNAs to the cG mRNA were calculated and shown in the bar graph.
In vitro transcription
Capped naturally intronless mRNAs were in vitro transcribed by using the mMessage mMachine Kit (Ambion), and the polyA tail was added with the Poly(A) tailing kit (Ambion) using the mMessage mMachine Kit reaction products. The mRNAs were purified with the MEGAclear Kit (Ambion). The polyA mRNAs were prepared in the same way, with the polyA-tailing step being omitted.
The DNA microinjected into the HeLa cells was extracted with TRI reagent with some modification based on the manufacturer’s protocols. After the RNA isolation, the interphase was removed to a new column. The DNA was precipitated with 3 M NaAc and 100% ethanol. The DNA pellet was washed twice in 0.1 M trisodium citrate and 10% ethanol solution. Following one more wash in 75% ethanol, the DNA pellet was dissolved in 8 mM NaOH. To amplify DNA by PCR, the solution was adjusted to pH 8.4 using 0.1 M Hepes.
All results were repeated at least three times in independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD or mean ± SEM, and statistical significance was determined by using the unpaired Student’s t test, which was two-sided. The variance was similar between the groups that were being statistically compared. Datasets were analyzed for statistical significance by using GraphPad Prism software (version 6). P 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows the evidence that speckle-localized HSPA1A mRNAs were released to the cytoplasm rather than being degraded. Fig. S2 shows multiple fragments of HSPA1A and JUND mRNAs associating with NSs. Fig. S3 shows the presence of ESEs in naturally intronless genes and that introducing ESEs does not cause cryptic splicing events of the cG mRNA. Fig. S4 shows the roles of SR and TREX proteins in speckle localization and nuclear export of intronless mRNAs and the distribution of exogenous HSPA1A or endogenous ZXDB mRNA in cells treated with UAP56 or NXF1 siRNAs. Fig. S5 shows SEP1 facilitates speckle association of cDNA transcripts. Table S1 shows siRNA and ASO targeting sequences. Table S2 shows probe sequences. Table S3 shows primer sequences. Videos 1, 2, 3, and 4 show colocalization of JUND (Video 1), HSPA1A (Video 2), RHOB (Video 3), and ZXDB (Video 4) mRNAs and SRSF2 with 3D reconstitutions.
We thank Cheng Lab members for useful suggestions and discussions.
This work was supported by grants from National Key RD Program of China (2017YFA0504400) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31570822, 91540104, and 31770880).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Author contributions: K. Wang and H. Cheng conceived the project. K. Wang performed most of the experiments and analysis. L. Wang made JUND fragment constructs and cultured the cells. J. Wang made cG-STE1, cG-STE2, cS-STE1, and cS-STE2 constructs and carried out parts of the microinjection, IF, and FISH experiments. S. Chen made HSPA1A fragment constructs. M. Shi performed parts of Western blotting. K. Wang and H. Cheng wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.