Four isoforms of the human fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2), with different intracellular localizations and distinct effects on cell phenotype, result from alternative initiations of translation at three CUG and one AUG start codons. We showed here by Western immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation that the CUG-initiated forms of FGF-2 were synthesized in transformed cells, whereas "normal" cells almost exclusively produced the AUG-initiated form. CUG-initiated FGF-2 was induced in primary skin fibroblasts in response to heat shock and oxidative stress. In transformed cells and in stressed fibroblasts, CUG expression was dependent on cis-elements within the 5' region of FGF-2 mRNA and was not correlated to mRNA level, indicating a translational regulation. UV cross-linking experiments revealed that CUG expression was linked to the binding of several cellular proteins to FGF-2 mRNA 5' region. Since translation of FGF-2 mRNA was previously shown to occur by internal ribosome entry, a nonclassical mechanism already described for picornaviruses, the cross-linking patterns of FGF-2 and picornavirus mRNAs were compared. Comigration of several proteins, including a p60, was observed. However, this p60 was shown to be different from the p57/PTB internal entry factor, suggesting a specificity towards FGF-2 mRNA. We report here a process of translational activation of the FGF-2 CUG-initiated forms in direct relation with trans-acting factors specific to transformed and stressed cells. These data favor a critical role of CUG-initiated FGF-2 in cell transformation and in the stress response.
Translation of CUG- but not AUG-initiated forms of human fibroblast growth factor 2 is activated in transformed and stressed cells.
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Tools Icon Tools
- Search Site
S Vagner, C Touriol, B Galy, S Audigier, M C Gensac, F Amalric, F Bayard, H Prats, A C Prats; Translation of CUG- but not AUG-initiated forms of human fibroblast growth factor 2 is activated in transformed and stressed cells.. J Cell Biol 1 December 1996; 135 (5): 1391–1402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.135.5.1391
Download citation file: