Previous studies suggest that the baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell fibronectin receptor is also a wheat germ agglutinin receptor (WGA-R). To analyze this possibility further, IgG and Fab fragments of antibodies produced against a BHK cell WGA-R preparation were tested to determine their effects on cell adhesion mediated by fibronectin, wheat germ agglutinin, concanavalin A, and polycationic ferritin. The WGA-R preparation was isolated by octylglucoside extraction of BHK cells followed by chromatography of the extract on WGA-agarose. The antibodies against the WGA-R preparation reacted primarily with polypeptides of molecular weights 48, 61, 83, 105, 120, 165, 210, and 230 kilodaltons (kdaltons). It was concluded that the antibodies interfered with BHK cell fibronectin receptors on the basis of the ability of anti-WGA-R IgG or Fab fragments to (a) inhibit cell spreading on fibronectin-coated substrata; (b) cause rounding and detachment of cells previously spread on fibronectin-coated substrata; and (c) inhibit binding of fibronectin-coated latex beads to the cells. Antibody activity was blocked by treatment of anti-WGA-R with the WGA-R preparation or by absorption of anti-WGA-R with intact BHK cells. The antibodies also appeared to prevent coupling of ligand-receptor complexes (involving concanavalin A or polycationic ferritin) with the cytoskeleton. Finally, cell rounding and detachment caused by the antibodies were found to require metabolic energy since it did not occur in the presence of azide or at 4 degrees C.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 1982
Article|
December 01 1982
Inhibition of fibronectin receptor function by antibodies against baby hamster kidney cell wheat germ agglutinin receptors.
N Oppenheimer-Marks
F Grinnell
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
J Cell Biol (1982) 95 (3): 876–884.
Citation
N Oppenheimer-Marks, F Grinnell; Inhibition of fibronectin receptor function by antibodies against baby hamster kidney cell wheat germ agglutinin receptors.. J Cell Biol 1 December 1982; 95 (3): 876–884. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.95.3.876
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Email alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement