Accessory fibers in most sperm surround the axoneme so that their function in propulsion is difficult to assess. In the sperm of the toad Bufo marinus, an accessory fiber is displaced from the axoneme, being connected to it by the thin undulating membrane in such a way that the movement of axoneme and accessory fiber can be viewed independently. The axoneme is highly convoluted in whole mounts, and the axial fiber is straight. Cinemicrographic analysis shows that it is the longer, flexuous fiber, the presumed axoneme, that move actively. The accessory fiber follows it passively with a lower amplitude of movement. The accessory fiber does not move independent of the axoneme, even after demembranation and reactivation of the sperm. On the basis of anatomical relations in the neck region, it appears that the accessory fibers of amphibians are analogous to the dense fibers of mammalian sperm. SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of demembranated toad sperm tails reveals two principal proteins in addition to the tubulins, the former probably arising from the accessory fibers and the matrix of the undulating membrane. The function of displacing an accessory fiber into an undulating membrane may be to provide stiffness for the tail without incurring an energy deficit large enough to require a long middle piece. A long middle piece is not present in toad sperm, in contrast to those sperm that have accessory fibers around the axoneme. However, the toad sperm suffers a reduction in speed of about one-third, compared with the speed expected for a sperm without an undulating membrane.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 June 1980
Article|
June 01 1980
Structure and function of the undulating membrane in spermatozoan propulsion in the toad Bufo marinus.
M A Swan
R W Linck
S Ito
D W Fawcett
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
J Cell Biol (1980) 85 (3): 866–880.
Citation
M A Swan, R W Linck, S Ito, D W Fawcett; Structure and function of the undulating membrane in spermatozoan propulsion in the toad Bufo marinus.. J Cell Biol 1 June 1980; 85 (3): 866–880. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.85.3.866
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement