The organisation of the myofibrils and the sarcoplasmic reticulum in frog slow muscle fibres has been compared with that in twitch fibres. It has been found that the filaments have the same length in the two types of fibre, but that there are differences in their packing: (a) in contrast to the regular arrangement of the I filaments near the Z line in twitch fibres, those in slow fibres are irregularly packed right up to their insertion into the Z line; (b) the Z line itself shows no ordered structure in slow fibres; (c) the fine cross-links seen between the A filaments at the M line level in twitch fibres are not present in slow fibres. The sarcoplasmic reticulum in slow fibres consists of two separate networks of tubules. One set of tubules (diameter about 500 to 800 A) is oriented mainly in a longitudinal direction. The tubules of the other network (diameter about 300 A) are oriented either transversely at approximately Z line level or longitudinally, connecting the transverse tubules. Triads are very rarely found, occurring at only every 5th or 6th Z line of each fibril. The central element of these triads is continuous with the thin tubules. Slow fibres from muscles soaked in ferritin-containing solutions contain ferritin particles in the network of thin tubules, the rest of the sarcoplasm remaining free of ferritin.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 August 1965
Article|
August 01 1965
A COMPARISON OF THE FINE STRUCTURES OF FROG SLOW AND TWITCH MUSCLE FIBRES
Sally G. Page
Sally G. Page
From the Department of Biophysics, University College, London, England
Search for other works by this author on:
Sally G. Page
From the Department of Biophysics, University College, London, England
Received:
December 18 1964
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
Copyright © 1965 by The Rockefeller University Press
1965
J Cell Biol (1965) 26 (2): 477–497.
Article history
Received:
December 18 1964
Citation
Sally G. Page; A COMPARISON OF THE FINE STRUCTURES OF FROG SLOW AND TWITCH MUSCLE FIBRES . J Cell Biol 1 August 1965; 26 (2): 477–497. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.26.2.477
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement