In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, spindle orientation is controlled by a temporal and spatial program of microtubule (MT)–cortex interactions. This program requires Bud6p/Aip3p to direct the old pole to the bud and confine the new pole to the mother cell. Bud6p function has been linked to Kar9p, a protein guiding MTs along actin cables. Here, we show that Kar9p does not mediate Bud6p functions in spindle orientation. Based on live microscopy analysis, kar9Δ cells maintained Bud6p-dependent MT capture. Conversely, bud6Δ cells supported Kar9p-associated MT delivery to the bud. Moreover, additive phenotypes in bud6Δ kar9Δ or bud6Δ dyn1Δ mutants underscored the separate contributions of Bud6p, Kar9p, and dynein to spindle positioning. Finally, tub2C354S, a mutation decreasing MT dynamics, suppressed a kar9Δ mutation in a BUD6-dependent manner. Thus, Kar9p-independent capture at Bud6p sites can effect spindle orientation provided MT turnover is reduced. Together, these results demonstrate Bud6p function in MT capture at the cell cortex, independent of Kar9p-mediated MT delivery along actin cables.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
25 October 2004
Article|
October 18 2004
Differential contribution of Bud6p and Kar9p to microtubule capture and spindle orientation in S. cerevisiae
Stephen M. Huisman,
Stephen M. Huisman
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Olivia A.M. Bales,
Olivia A.M. Bales
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Marie Bertrand,
Marie Bertrand
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Monique F.M.A. Smeets,
Monique F.M.A. Smeets
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Steven I. Reed,
Steven I. Reed
2Department of Molecular Biology, MB7 The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
Search for other works by this author on:
Marisa Segal
Marisa Segal
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephen M. Huisman
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Olivia A.M. Bales
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Marie Bertrand
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Monique F.M.A. Smeets
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Steven I. Reed
2Department of Molecular Biology, MB7 The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
Marisa Segal
1Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EH UK
Correspondence to Marisa Segal: [email protected]
Abbreviations used in this paper: DIC, differential interference contrast; MT, microtubule; SPB, spindle pole body; SPBd, daughter-bound SPB; SPBm, mother-bound SPB.
Received:
July 26 2004
Accepted:
September 10 2004
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
The Rockefeller University Press
2004
J Cell Biol (2004) 167 (2): 231–244.
Article history
Received:
July 26 2004
Accepted:
September 10 2004
Citation
Stephen M. Huisman, Olivia A.M. Bales, Marie Bertrand, Monique F.M.A. Smeets, Steven I. Reed, Marisa Segal; Differential contribution of Bud6p and Kar9p to microtubule capture and spindle orientation in S. cerevisiae . J Cell Biol 25 October 2004; 167 (2): 231–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200407167
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Email alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement